by Ralph Iver
The title of recent news articles say Jewish congressional candidate, Dan Adler "targets Asians with bizarre ad". That title should instead read "Dan Adler Targets Asians with Racist Ad".
It appears that he is stereotyping Asians and faces flack for his condescending approach to them. Perhaps the thought should occur to people that much racial impropriety by people who appear "White" are actually done by people who are Jews.
Adler states in his ad that "I definitely approve this message." What does he approve? With this video ad, expressing that he is Jewish, he approves that minorities "should stick together"--and the unspoken is against, who else, but majority Whites; implying that White people should be excluded; that he will represent minorities over Whites; that minorities should encourage thoughts and acts of racism toward Whites, at a minimum denying them adequate representation. Dan Adler's campaign presents a clear message of his intentions to disenfranchise a majority group of people based on their race: people of European descent.
In the past week, mainstream media has released that in ten states, White children under age 18 are now the minority. How does Adler's ad, a thinly veiled statement of prejudice towards Whites, fit in with that reality? Adler is a supporter of immigration reform and the DREAM act, which will hasten the demise of Westernization, Western values, and yes, White people as a race. His intent clearly is to make a shrinking race of Whites utter strangers in their own land. Indeed, for many of us, we already are.
Adding to the seriousness of all this is the fact that Whites are disallowed any claims to being victimized on account of their race--ever. It is extremely difficult to win an argument that Whites are often victims on account of their race, let alone stop actual disenfranchisement, loss of equity, and violence.
Adler uses his Jewishness (not his White skin color) to ally himself racially with local constituents, Asian people. However, do Asians understand that the creator of the atom bomb that decimated Hiroshima and Nagasaki was Jewish? J. Robert Oppenheimer, a communist, stated of his part in this genocide of Asians, "I carry no weight on my conscience." Alder seems to carry no weight on his conscience in using Asians and other "minorities" to promote his racist agenda to exclude White people from representation by their government officials. He carries no weight on his shoulder for his part for the coming loss of the United States as a Western nation. He carries no weight on his shoulders for promoting minorities to "stick together" as a group, deepening the wedges in the American identity and hastening balkanization.
But we are not looking solely at a racial issue. We have here an equally deep problem in the loss of Westernization. People have differing worldviews along racial and regional lines. In the grand scheme are the two major world views, the Occident and the Orient. The Occident, Westernization, is shrinking fast due to the flood of non-European immigration into European homelands. What will not be annihilated by the homicide of anti-White policies and laws will be completed with the suicide of socially-promoted "White Guilt". In their own countries, Koreans are the majority, Chinese are the majority, and Japanese are the majority--and proudly so; however, the United States, which had a 90% majority of Whites in 1960, has fallen so far since the 1965 immigration act that we will have no majority race in another 30 years. This is unimaginable in places like China and Korea. Floods of non-Asian immigration do not happen in Asian countries, yet, it is aggressively promoted in Western nations, even by law. Asians have protected their racial integrity and guarded their right to their non-Western world views. We are rapidly losing ours.
Pat Buchanan wrote in the introduction to his book, Death of the West,
"[N]o nation in history has gone through a demographic change of this magnitude in so short a time, and remained the same nation. Mr. Clinton assured us that it will be a better America when we are all minorities and realize true 'diversity'. Well, those students are going to find out, for they will spend their golden years in a Third World America. Uncontrolled immigration threatens to deconstruct the nation we grew up in and convert America into a conglomeration of peoples with almost nothing in common--not history, heroes, language, culture, faith, or ancestors. Balkanization beckons."
Who is Dan Adler, anyway? He is a member of the American Jewish Committee's National Board of Governors. He is also on a board of directors at the Israeli Policy Forum, a diplomatic organization that supports a two-state solution between the Israelis and Palestinians, and has been accused of being pro-Palestinian. Adler concurs with the two-state solution that might be in the interests of Palestinians. However, he takes the expected hard-line that "America's responsibility to Israel is an unshakable one". One of one side of his mouth he supports negotiations; on the other side negotiation is not possible, and America's loyalty must be "unshakable". He also stands against Iran--one more war positioned to wipe thousands more innocents off the map.
From the news, we find he is a former executive of Disney. Why is this important? Walt Disney cleaned up fairytales for children and promoted wholesome values for families, at a time when the nation was a majority of devout Christians. At the time of his production company, as a Christian he was a minority in a very Jewish Hollywood. Disney, a hardened anti-communist, was inconclusively rumored to be an anti-Semite (in other words, there is not enough evidence to this, and we will never know for sure). After his death, Disney productions was overtaken by the very people he purported held in contempt, and who have lead the company steadily away from Disney's values of old fashion commitment to family and decency.
The following is an excerpt about the transfer of power to Jewish bosses after Walt Disney's death, by William Pierce:
The real problem, of course, was that Walt Disney's vision of the world, as reflected in the films he produced, was wholly different from that of the Jewish film producers around him. As long as Walt was making Mickey Mouse or Donald Duck cartoons, this problem could be overlooked. When he began animating feature-length fairy tales like Snow White and Cinderella, the Jews in Hollywood became increasingly nervous. The world of Snow White was an entirely White world, a European world. It stirred racial memories in White Americans, and the aim of the Jewish media bosses then as now was to make White Americans forget their roots. They wanted to begin promoting multiculturalism as soon as the Second World War was over, and Walt was in their way. They couldn't push racial mixing in their films and have someone as popular as Walt Disney refuse to go along: the contrast would be obvious to the public. Even Disney's extremely popular Nature films were resented by the rest of Hollywood. Films which promoted a love for animals and the natural world were viewed with suspicion by men whose view of life was entirely economic and urban.
These may seem like subtle differences, and in fact most people outside of Hollywood were oblivious to the ideological and cultural conflict between Walt Disney and the other film producers. The closest that the conflict came to attracting public attention was during the 1940s and early 1950s, when Walt Disney's total lack of sympathy for Communism and his refusal to let Communist propaganda be introduced into any of his productions set him apart from the rest of Hollywood. While Walt was alive, however, there wasn't much that Hollywood could do about him. He was too popular with the American people.
After Walt died in 1966, however, the situation changed. His company had depended on his genius for its prosperity, and without him it had a difficult time keeping up with the competition. After Disney company profits had declined for several years, Jewish corporate raiders Saul Steinberg and Irwin Jacobs moved in for the kill. In 1984, after Steinberg had milked the company of $32 million, Disney family shareholders were too weak to resist a takeover by Michael Eisner, the Jewish boss of Paramount Pictures. Eisner in turn brought in as his second in command another Jew, Jeffrey Katzenberg. The company that Walt Disney built -- the company that gave us Snow White and Fantasia -- has been in Jewish hands ever since.
During his first day as chairman of the Disney company -- his first day, believe it or not -- Eisner ordered the production of an R-rated film, about the kinky sexual misadventures of a typically neurotic Jewish family in the Los Angeles area. This was the first R-rated film ever produced by the Disney company -- but certainly not the last.
Speaking of R-rated, Adler, backed by his former Disney colleague, Michael Eisner, produced two more video ads making use of R-rated language, having his 11-year old son use foul language for the cameras. Disney would have rolled over in his grave over how his vision, which was also America's vision in a more unified time, has been profoundly undermined.