Judaica And 911 Part II
12 years ago
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Blueprint for Global Enslavement
Alex Jones movie on Bilderberger meeting, Canada
Endgame:HQ Full Video- Blueprint For Global Enslavement
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM6US0Qk5_8&feature=PlayList&p=956FD7C702F45A97&index=0&playnext=1This movie is about 2 hours.
Some research I did as I took notes throughout the movie. Put this in a saved email file for later. I wrote some personal thoughts at the end of the email in italics.
GEORGIA GUIDESTONES:
http://www.radioliberty.com/stones.htm
http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/occult_dismantling_georgia_guidestones.htm
ROTHSCHILDS:
http://www.dejanlucic.net/Rothschilds%20Everywhere.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_family
LOGAN ACT:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan_Act
MI6:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MI6
NORTH AMERICAN UNION (NAU):
http://www.nauwarroom.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Union
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965
JUDICIAL WATCH FOUNDATION:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/
NON CITIZENS SERVING IN THE US MILITARY:
(Please note--should the US government decide to use force against its own citizens, US citizens in the military will resist firing upon our own people--we are their families. Foreigners will have no problem carrying out that crime.)
http://www.cna.org/documents/D0011092.a2.pdf
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/06/16/immigration_bill_offers_a_military_path_to_us_dream/
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1226/dailyUpdate.html
RED DAWN:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Dawn
AFRICAN UNION:
http://www.africa-union.org/root/au/index/index.htm
ASIAN UNION:
http://www.southasianunion.net/index.php
(I don't know how the music can be turned off.)
CENTRAL ASIAN UNION:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Asian_Union
Medvedev Unveils “World Currency” Coin At G8
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14326
UN GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
(Found this one on the way there--scroll down 1/4th of the way to "Agenda 21"--very important) http://waterwatchalliance.googlepages.com/agenda21
Scroll almost to the end under "population control"
http://www.crossroad.to/text/articles/Food-Land96.html
Apparently the assessment is a book:
http://www.cambridge.org/uk/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521564816
NAFTA SUPERHIGHWAY:
http://transtexascorridor.blogspot.com/
http://www.nascocorridor.com/
The Video: http://www.nascocorridor.com/video.htm (Changing the name of the hwy??)
http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2006/aug06/06-08-23.html
http://www.greatdreams.com/political/superhighway_facts.htm
FORCED STERILIZATION OF NATIVE AMERICANS--BY BUSH I:
http://www.whale.to/b/sterilisation_usa.html
FEMA CAMPS:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0P-hvPJPTi4
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7763
TEXAS GOVERNOR PERRY (violator of the Logan Act--treason)
His presence at a Bilderberg meeting means he could become president at some point.
http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/310507_perry_globalist.html
___________________________________
Now my personal thoughts: I was introduced to the Alex Jones materials probably 6 years ago and only intermittently perused it along the way. I have been hearing and searching about this idea of a plan to enslave the whole world very shortly after 9-11 happened. Before 9-11, I was invited by an internet friend to visit the Middle East. That was summer of 2001. I had the time of my life. I had no inkling or understanding of what lay ahead of me and the rest of the world when I boarded that plane.
Since that moment I have been on the journey along with a growing crowd of people towards doing my meager part to help save humanity from worldwide slavery. I have been to over a dozen countries since 2001, and I have met countless interesting people, and have made some important friendships. I have journeyed across the entire political spectrum and my final judgment on political self-identification is that most ordinary people actually behold the same interests in common, in their heart of hearts. We are cast into battles over slight differences from up above, the concentration of power that Alex Jones talks about in his video. People fight over the perceived evils of capitalism, socialism, and a whole list of "-isms", and call each other epithets like "fascists", "communist", and a whole list of other "-ists". The real problem we face today is the concentration of power that has a hold over all of it--and over all of us.
We've got to stop fighting each other--because we all need each other to stop this beast that is determined to destroy freedom of sovereignty--individual sovereignty, communal sovereignty, and the sovereignty of nations. No one in Europe should be forced to live under Middle Eastern law. No one in the Middle East should be forced to live under United States laws. US citizens should not be at the mercy of Mexico. And Iran must not be the next victim of our out of control government--the people of the United States and the People of Persia have nothing against one another. Their president is practically begging our corrupt government to not come bomb and destroy his nation and his people. But that war will be forced upon all of us to bring about the enslavement of our whole world.
God's law is free will--not slavery. The only service any human being is meant to offer is toward that Divine connection we each have personally--however we each see it or define it. It is only through our own divine connection that we can serve the divine in each other. The most important thing we can possibly do for each other is to constantly remind each other that it exists in each other. We each have the free will to stop and prevent worldwide slavery. The first and most important step we must take in stopping worldwide slavery is to accept ownership for what occurs between our ears--we must be independent--sovereign--in our own minds.
I strongly encourage everyone to seriously look into what is going on with the Irish vote coming up on the second go around with the Lisbon treaty. Ireland is the only country in Europe right now where by law a treaty can only be passed by popular vote. Denmark was such a country until they changed their laws and the elites that have infiltrated their government voted to pass the treaty. Ireland literally holds the last strand of sovereignty for all of the people of Europe. The Irish have spend the last five centuries fighting for their freedom from slavery, and are now being asked--again--to willingly give up their autonomy. We must support them in their efforts to prevent that. The Chech Republic is now backing away from the Lisbon treaty and they are supporting the Irish in taking yet another stand against this treaty of enslavement.
Why is that treaty important to us? Why is Ireland important to us? Because we--you and me--stand to lose our sovereignty as a nation as well, to the North American Union. When 9-11-01 happened, I'm sure you, as I did, were certain the United States government was going to lock down the borders for foreigners. I thought that suddenly immigrants of any kind would be stopped, at least temporarily, from crossing our borders. Surprisingly, exactly the opposite happened. Illegals have hemorrhaged across our southern borders, and it is WE the American CITIZENS who are the victims of monitoring, search, seizures, and even strip searched/body cavity searched at or before our borders
A word on "world overpopulation": If you take every human being on the planet, we would all fit comfortably within an area the size of Texas--we would have enough individual space and enough land to meet our personal needs. "Overpopulation" is a problem with the cities, where people live unnecessarily on top of each other. Through smart and environmentally friendly ideas--and ideas that still preserve individualism and liberties, we can all eat without destroying or decimating animals, sea life or plants. There's actually enough for everyone to eat well. "Overpopulation" is actually a falsehood. There's room for all of us, and not one of us need be sacrificed for the rest. Those who believe in population reduction should go kill themselves.
Jones doesn't get into it, but I believe most of the "elite" who seek such pathological control over the world are actually people who are psychopaths, or some who are anti-social. Here is one way psychopathy is defined:
Sounds very much like what we're dealing with. Most psychopaths end up behind bars. But the smart ones have careers--as supervisors, lawyers, politicians--anywhere that they can gain power over other people. That's the purpose of living as far as they are concerned. They are manipulative as hell. One thing to keep in mind about psychopaths is that they don't have a sense of another person's rights--they don't have a conscience. Get a group of really smart people who also lack conscience together--the image totally fits the description of how we are all going to hell in a handbasket. In other words, the global elite really are crazy.
Though he gets a lot of criticism from many groups, I have a lot of admiration and appreciation for Alex Jones.
Obama's Hometown a Cesspool of Black Youth Violence
Obama’s Hometown a Cesspool of Black Youth Violence: Is this the new America?
By Ralph Iver
Tonight’s news show a video where thirty-some teens of two rival Black gangs in Chicago beat each other up with large sticks, and 16 year old Derrion Albert was murdered. The actual cell phone footage is at this site. Pictured left are Silvonus Shannon and Eugene Riley, two out of four so far charged with the murder.
Black violence cannot be adequately explained because we cannot discuss it in terms of Black behavior, but blame must always somehow be linked to White people.
I wonder what the former community organizer in Chief, President Barack Hussein Obama, was doing with his time back in the days of South Chicago. While he sat Sunday after Sunday listening to Rev. Wright’s racist tirades against Whites, Obama apparently did not make much of a difference in his old neighborhoods now that teen violence among Blacks has skyrocketed, victimizing both Blacks and Whites. Have young Blacks and their parents interpreted a presidential win for their race as license for increased aggression? You tube is getting flooded with video after video of school bus beatings by gangs of Black teens and pre-teens–usually against White kids. Parents of these teens have so little control over their kids behaviors and even engage in racist violence against White children themselves!
Is this the kind of freedom the Civil Rights Movement sought back in the 1960’s–the freedom to kill and beat up innocents? Police officers all across the country get shamed out of doing their jobs in preventing this madness with the epithets of “racists” and “racial profilers” while young Blacks brazenly recreate little Rwandas all across the nation.
Obama’s administration is more concerned with spreading the lie and epithet that anyone who criticizes him is “racist” and does nothing about it but continue to support the false blame against Whites for the epidemic of violence among the Black population nationwide. Whites don’t create that problem–Blacks do. Look at Africa. Look at what happened to the former Rhodesia. Africans are doing that, not Whites. How about the breathtaking violence against their own women in places like the “Democratic” Republic of Congo? Whites don’t do that, Africans do. Blame Whites for slavery? Africans caught their own and Jews ran most of the trading. By the way, there are 27 million slaves and victims of human trafficking today! But none of that is seen as a problem.
The Black response to the expected violent behavior of most of their male youths? Constant denial. Let’s not call them “gang leaders”, as the “enemies” do (I presume he means White people), says Louis Farrukahn; let’s call those alpha thugs “Youth Leadership”. Let’s call it “random violence”, not a “hate crime” when the victims are White; Blacks “don’t want to put Black youth in the firing line of the justice system”. Even Black ministers and Black mayors contribute to the orgies of Black gang violence by looking the other way. Or young murders are called “good kids“. Bullets start flying in the projects and it’s blamed on poverty–tell that one to the White people all across Appalachia. In February of 2009, 60 percent of Kentucky Appalachians fell below poverty–and we never hear of gang violence among them. How many Appalachian kids die each year from Appalachian gangs?
Phil Jackson, of the Black Star Project in Chicago, sees failing schools, an abundance of jails and media images that promote the destruction of Black boys. “Worst of all is the passivity, the lack of urgency, the disengagement of the Black community as our sons are being destroyed,” said Mr. Jackson, who wore a yellow sweatshirt emblazoned with the slogan, “Educate or Die,” to an April 11 event held to recruit Black youth into preventive programming.
By the way, the media is controlled by Jews.
Who’s passivity?
Certainly not young Black males. A burglar gang of them certainly weren’t passive when they killed 12 year old Emily Haddock, sick at home with the flu. Another gang of them weren’t passive when they killed a White, pregnant 21 year old restaurant manager in Detroit a year ago. (It only takes five minutes to find all these You Tubes and articles, folks–the problem really is that bad.) We’ll never forget Channon Christian and Christopher Newsome.
Almost 50 Black kids beating up a White family in Akron, Ohio on July 7, 2009 shouting, “This is our world, and this is a Black world”, certainly wasn’t considered a racist hate crime. As the young man says in that video, if you are White, especially a White male, you have lost your 14th Amendment right to equal protection under the law: You are out of luck if you think it’s a hate crime.
Had enough? This was brought on by the most recent report that over 30 school kids have been murdered this year by such thugs in the former community organizer, Obama’s hometown. I think I blew a gasket when I saw that article. Welcome to Obamanation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=em55RSIS--s&feature=player_embeddedTuesday, September 22, 2009
Tuesday 9-22 Not News: Congresswoman A Blackmailed Lesbian
The following article came from http://almost117days.blogspot.com/
Tuesday 9-22 Not News: Congresswoman A Blackmailed Lesbian
Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky of Illinois was named by Sibel Edmonds in an interview as the woman who was blackmailed by agents of a foreign country Turkey after getting her involved in a set up affair with a lesbian. Normally, any sex scandal is guaranteed to make it on the nightly news. Throw in some foreign agents, bribery, treason and blackmail and you might think it would be the lead. This story made it into the blogs weeks ago and was featured again at Brad's Blog after the name of the Democrat congresswoman being blackmailed was made public.
When Sibel Edmonds testified at a libel trial in Ohio a few weeks ago, she named former House Speaker Hastert, a Republican, and Steve Solarz, a New York Democrat, as men who received bribes by the Turkish government which they passed on to fellow congressmen. This was not news. Why? After all she did accuse them of selling American nuclear secrets to a foreign nation which is treason. So again I ask why not?
Because her testimony linked the Turkish espionage case not only to the American Military Industrial Complex but also to Israel.
You can read Philip Giraldi's interview of Sibel Edmonds here: Who’s Afraid of Sibel Edmonds? Giraldi is a retired and honest ex-CIA agent.
This was definitely never allowed to be news: It happened in America: Katrina's secret jail Excerpts: not formally charged, was not read Miranda rights, was not allowed a phone call. He was physically and verbally abused, pepper sprayed, strip-and body-cavity searched...Prisoners included Marlene Maten, 73-year-old diabetic deaconess at Resurrection Mission Baptist Church,,,Zeitoun and hundreds of others from Camp Greyhound, ended up at maximum security Elayn Hunt Correctional Center, in St. Gabriel, La.,,,Released from Hunt on Sept. 29, 2005 - after paying a $75,000 bail - Zeitoun was lucky, compared with the three men he was arrested with. (Note Katrina hit New Orleans one month earlier on August 29th.)
Now this case got front page treatment for awhile until FBI False-Flag Goes Bust in NYC the fact that their suspect was an FBI informant. The FBI gave their version here: FBI says imam Ahmad Afzali worked both sides and tipped off suspects
The relation between chronic diseases and death from swine flu in children is ignored by the press and the CDC: Despite Anti-Vitamin D Bias, CDC Stumbles on Deficiency Link to H1N1 Deaths
ABC's Charlie Gibson was on WLS radio and said he knew nothing about ACORN. He had to be told that undercover reporters had filmed ACORN employees offering legal and tax advice to supposed brothel operators who wanted to bring 13 year-old prostitutes from Latin America. He said he never knew about the five video taped stings which made it onto Drudge and into the blogosphere. Charlie Gibson on WLS Radio Clueless About ACORN Scandal It would seem we get Better News Coverage By Comedians: 'Thank You ACORN': Leno Plays 'Commercial' Featuring Prostitutes Gratitude
HSBC = Hong Kong Shanghai Bank Corp. They are big time money launderers. When the people who launder drug money drop the dollar, it is time to head for the exits. Clinton created Plan Colombia six months after Colombian rebels in FARC refused to invest their money in the NYSE. And then there is this: Cheap dollars are sowing the seeds of the next world crisis
ISI's Carrie Butler said: For those of you who like conspiracy theories: The Fed is no longer publishing MEW (Mortgage Equity Withdrawal). This was one of the engines of the financial crisis - so much for an early warning on the next housing crisis. ISI will estimate the three main components of the Fed's report and like our estimate for some the old "M" statistics it will be there down the road when needed again.
Now stories about a small businessman who set up a pension plan for his employees and was fined 1.2 million by the IRS even though he followed advice from a CPA is definitely not news. And this isn't newsworthy either: Young see incomes crash since 2000
This was posted here: http://almost117days.blogspot.com/
Tuesday 9-22 Not News: Congresswoman A Blackmailed Lesbian
Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky of Illinois was named by Sibel Edmonds in an interview as the woman who was blackmailed by agents of a foreign country Turkey after getting her involved in a set up affair with a lesbian. Normally, any sex scandal is guaranteed to make it on the nightly news. Throw in some foreign agents, bribery, treason and blackmail and you might think it would be the lead. This story made it into the blogs weeks ago and was featured again at Brad's Blog after the name of the Democrat congresswoman being blackmailed was made public.
When Sibel Edmonds testified at a libel trial in Ohio a few weeks ago, she named former House Speaker Hastert, a Republican, and Steve Solarz, a New York Democrat, as men who received bribes by the Turkish government which they passed on to fellow congressmen. This was not news. Why? After all she did accuse them of selling American nuclear secrets to a foreign nation which is treason. So again I ask why not?
Because her testimony linked the Turkish espionage case not only to the American Military Industrial Complex but also to Israel.
You can read Philip Giraldi's interview of Sibel Edmonds here: Who’s Afraid of Sibel Edmonds? Giraldi is a retired and honest ex-CIA agent.
This was definitely never allowed to be news: It happened in America: Katrina's secret jail Excerpts: not formally charged, was not read Miranda rights, was not allowed a phone call. He was physically and verbally abused, pepper sprayed, strip-and body-cavity searched...Prisoners included Marlene Maten, 73-year-old diabetic deaconess at Resurrection Mission Baptist Church,,,Zeitoun and hundreds of others from Camp Greyhound, ended up at maximum security Elayn Hunt Correctional Center, in St. Gabriel, La.,,,Released from Hunt on Sept. 29, 2005 - after paying a $75,000 bail - Zeitoun was lucky, compared with the three men he was arrested with. (Note Katrina hit New Orleans one month earlier on August 29th.)
Now this case got front page treatment for awhile until FBI False-Flag Goes Bust in NYC the fact that their suspect was an FBI informant. The FBI gave their version here: FBI says imam Ahmad Afzali worked both sides and tipped off suspects
The relation between chronic diseases and death from swine flu in children is ignored by the press and the CDC: Despite Anti-Vitamin D Bias, CDC Stumbles on Deficiency Link to H1N1 Deaths
ABC's Charlie Gibson was on WLS radio and said he knew nothing about ACORN. He had to be told that undercover reporters had filmed ACORN employees offering legal and tax advice to supposed brothel operators who wanted to bring 13 year-old prostitutes from Latin America. He said he never knew about the five video taped stings which made it onto Drudge and into the blogosphere. Charlie Gibson on WLS Radio Clueless About ACORN Scandal It would seem we get Better News Coverage By Comedians: 'Thank You ACORN': Leno Plays 'Commercial' Featuring Prostitutes Gratitude
HSBC = Hong Kong Shanghai Bank Corp. They are big time money launderers. When the people who launder drug money drop the dollar, it is time to head for the exits. Clinton created Plan Colombia six months after Colombian rebels in FARC refused to invest their money in the NYSE. And then there is this: Cheap dollars are sowing the seeds of the next world crisis
ISI's Carrie Butler said: For those of you who like conspiracy theories: The Fed is no longer publishing MEW (Mortgage Equity Withdrawal). This was one of the engines of the financial crisis - so much for an early warning on the next housing crisis. ISI will estimate the three main components of the Fed's report and like our estimate for some the old "M" statistics it will be there down the road when needed again.
Now stories about a small businessman who set up a pension plan for his employees and was fined 1.2 million by the IRS even though he followed advice from a CPA is definitely not news. And this isn't newsworthy either: Young see incomes crash since 2000
This was posted here: http://almost117days.blogspot.com/
Friday, September 18, 2009
Video: explanation of British history of Euthanasia behind Obamacare
A friend in Oregon sent me the following video of and interview with Anton Chaitkin:
http://www.larouchepac.com/lpactv?nid=11764
The video is 15 minutes.
A friend wrote this about a mutual friend in response to the video:
A lot of people support the Obama administration's healthcare reform plan without looking more deeply into it. It's an arduous task. A smidgen of that has been done here for you going on the video. I think it's always important in studying the who's who in governmental and media action. I get at issues most often through the question, "well, who is this guy anyway?" This always leads me into interesting places. I reject the "they" fingerpointing. I want to know specifically who "they" are.
Tony Blair's Minister for Healthcare Reform, Simon Stevens was discussed. This guy:
http://www.aarpinternational.org/bio/bio_show.htm?doc_id=676069
http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/who_we_are/whos_who/board_of_trustees/simon_stevens.html
Stevens became the head of "America's Health Insurance Plans" Pay attention to that part of the video at about 11:30 minutes when Chaitkin tells about his experience at their conference on cutting Medicare. He posed an important question to the strategist, Stuart Altman . I am not surprise at the reaction he got given the crowd there.
From the site on Altman:
I thought this statement from a Simon Stevens search was interesting:
http://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/newsroom/news.aspx?id=94bf6736-1629-4fdf-83e5-f08db6bb073a
My mother was in nursing homes for many years. She went to the hospital numerous times. The only way I can see that they could have reduced her admissions to the hospital was either to allow her to suffer or allow her to die. She never went to hospitals superficially. The next generation for the kind of "care" proposed for the elderly is the baby boomer generation. That means many of you, and I don't want to see any of you go in any way but on your own terms.
This reminds me of how there was a movement in the early 1990's to unload and shut down long term psychiatric wards for chronically mentally ill people who ended up living in them for many years. The idea was to give them their freedom and get them into community residential programs. That first bunch of patients worked out pretty well--they came from a structured environment into a less structured one. But no more. The people today who would have been in long term hospitalization now live in homeless shelters and are on the streets and in the woods--and they are almost impossible to place (they usually don't stay) into community residential programs--because without the structure of hospitalizations, they are now feral human beings.
What was believed to be a savings to taxpayers, and a fulfillment of rhetoric on human rights, has caused untold human suffering and a hidden rise in taxpayer burdens.
Just because something sounds like a good idea doesn't mean it would be good practice. Communist governments killed over 100 million of their own people in less than a century. Fact check me. People still think communism under other name changes is a good idea. For the life of me, I can't understand why people would, except that they don't know history--and they watch TV instead.
http://www.larouchepac.com/lpactv?nid=11764
The video is 15 minutes.
A friend wrote this about a mutual friend in response to the video:
a friend's mother was actually 'treated' in this way...
morphine and dehydration... until she died.
my friend didn't understand. i did.
her sister had 'asked' the doctor to make sure that her
mother didn't keep getting sick and bringing her back
to town, since she travels a lot and was being
inconvenienced by her mother's weak health.
the doctor managed to make sure that her mother
never got sick again. she was strong.
she would have lived if simply allowed to regain
consciousness.
she was, for all practical purposes, murdered.
i watched it.
A lot of people support the Obama administration's healthcare reform plan without looking more deeply into it. It's an arduous task. A smidgen of that has been done here for you going on the video. I think it's always important in studying the who's who in governmental and media action. I get at issues most often through the question, "well, who is this guy anyway?" This always leads me into interesting places. I reject the "they" fingerpointing. I want to know specifically who "they" are.
Tony Blair's Minister for Healthcare Reform, Simon Stevens was discussed. This guy:
http://www.aarpinternational.org/bio/bio_show.htm?doc_id=676069
http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/who_we_are/whos_who/board_of_trustees/simon_stevens.html
Stevens became the head of "America's Health Insurance Plans"
From the site on Altman:
Altman has spoken out in favor of a 2006 law requiring Massachusetts citizens to obtain health insurance or face fines, saying the plan’s success comes because it is built upon existing health insurance structures “rather than disrupting the private insurance system.”Cohn, Kenneth H., “An Interview with Stuart H. Altman,” healthcarecollaboration.com , December 10, 2008 (7)Cohn, Kenneth H., “An Interview with Stuart H. Altman,” healthcarecollaboration.com, December 10, 2008
I thought this statement from a Simon Stevens search was interesting:
http://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/newsroom/news.aspx?id=94bf6736-1629-4fdf-83e5-f08db6bb073a
For example, the report projects that over the next 10 years approximately $55 billion could be saved by reducing seniors’ avoidable readmissions to hospitals partly by providing ‘transitional care’ support. Also, $37 billion could be saved through voluntary programs that help seniors choose to receive care from high quality and efficient care providers. And, $166 billion could be saved by reducing the need for people living in nursing homes to be admitted to a hospital. How the cost containment options are employed could range along a spectrum from voluntary uptake to the use of financial or non-financial incentives for beneficiaries and care providers.
My mother was in nursing homes for many years. She went to the hospital numerous times. The only way I can see that they could have reduced her admissions to the hospital was either to allow her to suffer or allow her to die. She never went to hospitals superficially. The next generation for the kind of "care" proposed for the elderly is the baby boomer generation. That means many of you, and I don't want to see any of you go in any way but on your own terms.
This reminds me of how there was a movement in the early 1990's to unload and shut down long term psychiatric wards for chronically mentally ill people who ended up living in them for many years. The idea was to give them their freedom and get them into community residential programs. That first bunch of patients worked out pretty well--they came from a structured environment into a less structured one. But no more. The people today who would have been in long term hospitalization now live in homeless shelters and are on the streets and in the woods--and they are almost impossible to place (they usually don't stay) into community residential programs--because without the structure of hospitalizations, they are now feral human beings.
What was believed to be a savings to taxpayers, and a fulfillment of rhetoric on human rights, has caused untold human suffering and a hidden rise in taxpayer burdens.
Just because something sounds like a good idea doesn't mean it would be good practice. Communist governments killed over 100 million of their own people in less than a century. Fact check me. People still think communism under other name changes is a good idea. For the life of me, I can't understand why people would, except that they don't know history--and they watch TV instead.
Sunday, September 13, 2009
US Patriots Flood Washington DC
US Patriots Flood Washington, DCSeptember 12, 2009
A Photo Essay
By Ralph Iver
At the moment, there is a debate on the size of the 9-12 march in Washington DC today. ABC came out saying the 1-1.5 million attributed to them at the march is incorrect, and they estimate the numbers at 60,000-70,000. However, the National Park Services seem to be placing that number much higher, and you can see the crowd shot from the middle of the march here.
I came in from the back of the rally at the Capitol around 1pm. There was more than 70,000--I have witnessed many rallies and marches, been to some with as many as 300,000 and one estimated at almost a million. At that late time of day, my eyes saw more than ABC's official estimate. Check back at Malkin's site to see what she comes up with.
I joined my fellow "White malcontents" (Maureen Dowd) to express my "cultural and racial anxiety" (Paul Krugman) over the tax burden faced by future generations on behalf of the present one. I suppose that because the current president is Black I am not supposed to be in disagreement with him because he is Black--that might be racist. You see, being Black is apparently a handicap and a Black POTUS needs to be treated with kid gloves. It turns out that while there weren't a lot of them, there were also some "Black malcontents" at the march. Perhaps they also had "cultural and racial anxiety", but I couldn't tell--they seemed to be more concerned with such oddities as the constitution and the money being blown by the government. I did wonder what all the Black police officers thought about this right-wing conspiracy happening all around them.
Yes, the vast majority of the march attendees were White. They were mostly middle class, clean cut people. Many of them older and elderly. I saw quite a few of the elderly with wheeled-walkers. I also saw on wheels babies and small children in strollers. I noticed that at least half were women. In spite of the "malcontented" "racial anxiety", the crowd was laid-back and mostly paid attention to the speakers at the rally. As bizarre as it sounds, a million or more smiles and friendly conversations were exchanged between people in this "threatening...mob".
Aside from the between tens of thousands (to possibly a million) individuals who traveled from all over the country to show their patriotism, many groups were represented: TEA Party Patriots, Campaign for Liberty, Ron Paul supporters, Rand Paul supporters, Townhall, the Council of Conservative Citizens, the American Patriots Committee, Give Me Liberty, 9.12.09 March on Washington, Libertas, and a million more organizations.
You'll see the sentiments people voiced in their signs in the photographs. Many of them referenced very real concerns about socialism. One recurrent theme, however, needs to be addressed. I saw the word "czar" all throughout the crowd. For Americans, we see that word and think back to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (it has always interested me how we dropped the word "Socialist" and simply called it the "Soviet Union"). While we can all understand the reference is to socialism, the mention of "czar" is an error I would like to see corrected in American minds. It was upon the murder of the last tsar, Nicolas II, when the communist Bolshevik coup occurred. The tsar, nor any of the previous czars, ever had anything to do with Marxism or communism. Czars were old Europe--they were kings and queens.
Instead of czar, a more correct reference would be to the Bolsheviks--for indeed, we Americans have gone from the Neo-Cons of the Bush administration to the Bolsheviks of the Obama administration. They are sometimes called Neo-Libs. They are simply the same people. I explained to a few folks there how 60 million ethnic Russian--Christians, that is--were murdered by the Bolsheviks, and encouraged them to do their own homework on who the Bolsheviks really were. If you've been doing your homework, you already know they were Jewish and Jewish-controlled terrorists and murderers. The czars of European ancestry didn't do all that--the biological and political ancestors of the people who are and have been in the White House did that.
Enjoy the photos. --Ralph Iver
Continue to the photos:
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Another Heretic is on the loose
Some guy named Daniel is asking a lot of dangerous questions that might get him into trouble. READ HIS BLOG: http://openingmind.blogspot.com/
Question
We have lost more than 2,000,000 American manufacturing jobs in the past
two years. Unlike the previous recessions, the majority of lay offs are
permanent and not for just a few months as in the past.
The definition of unemployment used up until 1994 is called U-6 and is
currently 16.8% as compared to the 9.7% U-3 figure the media allows the
government to report.
The CIA museum has a listening device that looks like a dragonfly but is
actually a battery powered drone that eavesdrops on conversations and transmits
them to a satellite above. That drone is an example of CIA museum piece
technology dating back to 1978.
My question is this: Why have you not gone to the CIA and asked them for
one of their more advanced secret batteries to make hybrid cars and alternative
energy affordable and more practical? One act of courage just might in part save
the world from a Depression many think will be worse than 1929-1939.
Please ask this question in public forums to any available politician or
media personality.
Charlie Sheen's letter to POTUS, Barack Obama
911 WAS A CRIME COMMITTED BY OUR OWN GOVERNMENT
From PrisonPlanet.com:
I recently had the pleasure of sitting down with our 44th President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, while he was out promoting his health care reform initiative. I requested 30 minutes given the scope and detail of my inquiry; they said I could have 20. Twenty minutes, 1200 seconds, not a lot of time to question the President about one of the most important events in our nation’s history. The following is a transcript of our remarkable discussion.
————————————————————————————————————————
Charlie Sheen – Good afternoon Mr. President, thank you so much for taking time out of your demanding schedule.
President Barack Obama – My pleasure, the content of your request seemed like something I should carve out a few minutes for.
CS – I should point out that I voted for you, as your promises of hope and change, transparency and accountability, as well as putting government back into the hands of the American people, struck an emotional chord in me that I hadn’t felt in quite some time, perhaps ever.
PBO – And I appreciate that Charlie. Big fan of the show, by the way.
CS – Sir, I can’t imagine when you might find the time to actually watch my show given the measure of what you inherited.
PBO – I have it Tivo’d on Air Force One. Nice break from the traveling press corps. (He glances at his watch) not to be abrupt or to rush you, but you have 19 minutes left.
CS – I’ll take that as an invitation to cut to the chase.
PBO – I’m all ears. Or so I’ve been told.
CS – Sir, in the very near future we will be experiencing our first 9/11 anniversary with you as Commander in Chief.
PBO – Yes. A very solemn day for our Nation. A day of reflection and yet a day of historical consciousness as well.
CS – Very much so sir, very much so indeed…. Now; In researching your position regarding the events of 9/11 and the subsequent investigation that followed, am I correct to understand that you fully support and endorse the findings of the commission report otherwise known as the ‘official story’?
PBO – Do I have any reason not to? Given that most of us are presumably in touch with similar evidence.
CS – I really wish that were the case, sir. Are you aware, Mr. President, of the recent stunning revelations that sixty percent of the 9/11 commissioners have publicly stated that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11 and that the Pentagon was engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack?
PBO – I am aware of certain “in fighting” during the course of their very thorough and tireless investigative process.
CS – Mr. President, it’s hard to label this type of friction as “in fighting” or make the irresponsible leap to “thorough,” when the evidence I insist you examine regarding 6 of the 10 members are statements of fact.
(At this point one of Obama’s senior aides approaches the President and whispers into his ear. Obama glances quickly at his watch and nods as the aide resumes his post at the doorway, directly behind me.)
PBO – No disrespect Mr. Sheen, but I have to ask; what is it that you seem to be implying with the initial direction of this discussion?
CS – I am not implying anything Mr. President. I am here to present the facts and see what you plan to do with them.
PBO - Let me guess; your ‘facts,’ allegedly supporting these claims are in the folders you brought with you?
CS – Good guess Mr. President.
(I hand the first folder of documents to the President)
CS – Again sir, these are not my opinions or assumptions, this is all a matter of public record, reported through mainstream media, painstakingly fact checked and verified.
(the President glances into the folder I handed him)
CS – You’ll notice sir on page one of the dossier dated August of ‘06 from the Washington Post, the statements of John Farmer, senior council to the 9/11 commission, his quote stating, “I was shocked how different the truth was from the way it was described.”
PBO – (as he glances down at the report, almost inaudible) …. um hmm….
CS – He goes on to further state “The [NORAD Air Defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years….”
(the President continues to view the documents)
Charlie Sheen writing 20 Minutes with the President. Photo by Alex Jones. CS – On pages two and three, sir, are the statements, as well, from commission co-chairmen Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, commissioners Bob Kerrey, Timothy Roemer and John Lehman, as well as the statements of commissioner Max Cleland, an ex-Senator from Georgia , who resigned, stating:
“It is a national scandal. This investigation is now compromised. One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9/11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up.”
He also described President Bush’s desire to delay the process as not to damage the ‘04 re-election bid. They suspected deception to the point where they considered referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation. Mr. President, this information alone is unequivocally grounds for a new investigation!
PBO – Mistakes were clearly made but we as a people and as a country need to move forward. It is obviously in our best interest as a democratic society to focus our efforts and our resources on the future of this great nation and our ability to protect the American people and our allies from this type of terrorism in the coming years.
CS – Sir, how can we focus on the future when THE COMMISSION ITSELF is on record stating that they still do not know the truth??
PBO – Even if what you state, might in some capacity, begin to approach an open discussion or balanced debate, I can’t speak for, or about the decisions certain commission members made during an extremely difficult period. Perhaps you should be interviewing them instead of me. Wait, don’t tell me; I was easier to track down than they were?
CS - Not exactly sir, but let’s be honest. You’re the President of the United States, the leader of the free world, the buck stops with you. 9/11 has been the pretext for the systematic dismantling of our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Your administration is reading from the same playbook that the Bush administration foisted on America through documented secrecy and deception.
PBO – Mr. Sheen, I’m having a difficult time sitting here and listening to you draw distorted parallels between the Bush/Cheney regime and mine.
CS – Mr. President the parallels are not distorted just because you say they are. Let’s stick to the facts. You promised to abolish the Patriot Act and then voted to re-authorize it. You pledged to end warrantless wire tapping against the American people and now energetically defend it. You decried the practice of rendition and now continue it. You promised over and over again on the campaign trail, that you would end the practice of indefinite detention and instead, you have expanded it to permanent detention of “detainees” without trial. This far exceeds the outrages of the former administration. Call me crazy Mr. President, but is this not your record?
PBO – Mr. Sheen, my staff and I authorized this interview based on your request to discuss 9/11 and deliver some additional information you’re convinced I’d not previously reviewed. Call me crazy, But it appears as though you’ve blindly wandered off topic.
CS – Sir, the examples I just illustrated are a direct result of 9/11.
PBO – And I’m telling you that we must move forward, we must endure through these dangerous and politically challenging years ahead.
CS – Mr. President, we cannot move forward with a bottomless warren of unanswered questions surrounding that day and its aftermath.
PBO – I read the official report. Every word every page. Perhaps you should do the same.
CS – I have sir, and so have thousands of family members of the victims, and guess what; they have the same questions I do and probably a lot more. I didn’t lose a loved one on that horrific day Mr. President and neither did you. But since then I, along with millions of other Americans lost something we held true and dear for most of our lives in this great country of ours; we lost our hope.
PBO – And I’d like to believe that I am here to restore that hope. To restore confidence in your leaders, in the system that the voting public chose through a peaceful transfer of power.
(An odd moment of silence between us. Precious time ticking away).
CS – Mr. President, are you aware of the number of days it took to begin the investigation into JFK’s assassination?
PBO – If memory serves I believe it was two weeks.
CS – Close. Seventeen days to be exact. Are you aware sir, how long it took to begin the investigation into Pearl Harbor?
PBO – I would say again about….two weeks.
CS – Close again sir, eleven days to be exact. Are you aware Mr. President how long it took to begin the investigation into 9/11?
PBO – I know it must have seemed like a very long time for all the grieving families.
CS – It was a very long time Mr. President – four hundred and forty days. Roughly 14 months. Does it bother you Mr. President that it only took FIVE HOURS for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld after the initial attack to recommend and endorse a full scale offensive against Iraq?
PBO – I am not aware of any such purported claim.
CS – I have the proof Mr. President, along with scores of documents and facts I’d like you to take a look at. Here.
(I hand him another file – much thicker than the first)
PBO – I see you came prepared Charlie.
CS – No other way to show up Mr. President. When in doubt over prepare I always say.
PBO – Now you sound like the First Lady.
CS – That’s quite a compliment sir.
PBO – As you wish. Please continue.
CS – Sir, I’d like to direct your attention to the stack of documents in the folder I just handed you. The first in from the top is entitled “Operation Northwoods”, a declassified Pentagon plan to stage terror attacks on US soil, to be blamed on Cuba as a pretext for war.
PBO – And I’d like to direct your attention to the fact that the principle draftsman of this improbable blueprint was quickly denied a second term as Joint Chiefs chairman and sent packing to a European NATO garrison. Thank God his otherworldly ambitions never saw the light of day.
CS – I wouldn’t be so certain about that Mr. President.
PBO – I could easily say the same to you Charlie.
(the President checks his watch)
CS – The next document reads “Declassified staged provocations.” Now, Honestly Mr. President I wish I was making this stuff up. I’m certain you are familiar with the USS Maine Incident, the sinking of the Lusitania, which we all now know brought us into WW1, and of course the most famous, the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
PBO – Of course I am familiar with these historical events and I’m aware that there’s a measure of controversy surrounding them. But to be quite frank with you, this is all ancient history.
CS – Mr. President, it has been often said; “Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.” And I concede to you sir, these events are the past.
PBO – A vastly different world young man, shouldering a radically disparate state of universal affairs.
CS – No argument sir, I‘m merely inviting you to acknowledge some credibility to the pattern or the theme. Case in point; the next document in your folder. It was published by the think-tank, Project For a New American Century and it’s entitled “Rebuilding Americas Defenses”, and was written by Dick Cheney and Jeb Bush. To quote from the document sir – (the President interrupts)
PBO – “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”
CS РTouch̩, sir. Your thoughts on this statement Mr. President?
PBO – I would call this a blatant case of misjudgment fueled by an unfortunate milieu of assumption. For some, the uninformed denial of coincidence.
CS – Interesting angle sir. Nevertheless, Vice President Cheney didn’t stop there. In early 2008, Pulitzer prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh and MSNBC, both reported that Cheney had proposed to the Pentagon an outrageous plan to have the U.S. Navy create fake Iranian patrol boats, to be manned by Navy Seals, who would then stage an attack on US destroyers in the Strait of Hormuz. This event was to be blamed on Iran and used as a pretext for war. Does any of this information worry you Mr. President? Should we just ignore it, until these realities can be dismissed years from now by our children, as ancient history as well?
PBO – Of course this information worries me, yet it’s not nearly as worrisome as you sitting here today suspiciously implying that 9/11 was somehow allowed to happen or even orchestrated from the inside.
CS – Mr. President I am not suspiciously implying anything. I am merely exposing the documents and asking the questions that nobody in power will even look at or acknowledge. And as I stated earlier, I voted for you, I believed in your message of hope and change. Mr. President I have come to you specifically hoping for a change. A change in the perception that our government has not yet made itself open and accountable to the people. These are your words Mr. President not mine. The lives of thousands were brutally cut short and those left behind to suffer their infinite pain are with me today Mr. President. They are with me in spirit and flesh, and the message we carry will not be silenced anymore by media fueled mantras insisting how they are supposed to feel. Deciding for them, for 8 long years, what can be thought, what can be said, what can be asked.
PBO – And I appreciate your passion, I appreciate your conviction. In spite of your concerns, in spite of what your data might or might not reveal, what you and the families must understand and accept is that we are doing everything we can to protect you.
CS – Mr. President , I realize were very short on time, so please allow me to run down a list of bullet points that might illuminate some reasons why we don’t embrace the warm hug of Federal protection.
PBO – We’ve come this far. Fire away.
CS – Please keep in mind Mr. President everything I’m about to say is documented as fact and part of the public record. The information you are holding in your hands chronicles and verifies each and every point.
PBO – You have five minutes left. The floor is yours. Brief me.
CS – Thank you Mr. President. Okay, first; On the FBI’s most wanted list Osama Bin Laden is not charged with the crimes of 911. When I called the FBI to ask them why this was the case, they replied: “There’s not enough evidence to link Bin Laden to the crime scene,” I later discovered he had never even been indicted by the D.O.J.
CS – Number 2; FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, was dismissed and gagged by the D.O.J. after she revealed that the government had foreknowledge of plans to attack American cities using planes as bombs as early as April 2001. In July of ‘09, Mrs. Edmonds broke the Federal gag order and went public to reveal that Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and the Taliban were all working for and with the C.I.A. up until the day of 9/11.
CS – Number 3; The following is a quote from Mayor Giuliani during an interview on 9/11 with Peter Jennings for ABC News. “I went down to the scene and we set up headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse. And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit and got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us.”
WHO TOLD HIM THIS??? To this day, the answer to this question remains unanswered, completely ignored and emphatically DENIED by Mayor Giuliani on several public occasions.
CS – Number 4; In April 2004, USA Today reported, “In the two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the North American Aerospace Defense Command conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties.” One of the targets was the World Trade Center.
CS – Number 5; On September 12th 2007, CNN’s ‘Anderson Cooper 360’, reported that the mysterious “white plane” spotted and videotaped by multiple media outlets, flying in restricted airspace over the White House shortly before 10am on the morning of 9/11, was in fact the Air Force’s E-4B, a specially modified Boeing 747 with a communications pod behind the cockpit; otherwise known as “The Doomsday Plane”.
Though fully aware of the event, the 9/11 Commission did not deem the appearance of the military plane to be of any interest and did not include it in the final 9/11 Commission report.
CS – Number 6; Three F-16s assigned to Andrews Air Force Base, ten miles from Washington, DC, are conducting training exercises in North Carolina 207 miles away as the first plane crashes into the WTC. Even at significantly less than their top speed of 1500 mph, they could still have defended the skies over Washington well before 9am, more than 37 minutes before Flight 77 crashes into the Pentagon, however, they did not return until after 9:55am.
Andrews AFB had no armed fighters on alert and ready to take off on the morning of 9/11.
CS – Number 7; WTC Building 7. Watch the video of its collapse.
CS – Number 8; Flight 93 is fourth plane to crash on 9/11 at 10:03am. V.P. Cheney only gives shoot down order at 10:10-10:20am and this is not communicated to NORAD until 28 minutes after Flight 93 has crashed.
Fueling further suspicion on this front is the fact that three months before the attacks of 9/11, Dick Cheney usurped control of NORAD, and therefore he, and no one else on planet Earth, had the power to call for military sorties on the hijacked airliners on 9/11. He did not exercise that power. Three months after 9/11, he relinquished command of NORAD and returned it to military operation.
CS – Number 9; Scores of main stream news outlets reported that the F.B.I. conducted an investigation of at least FIVE of the 9/11 hijackers being trained at U.S. military flight schools. Those investigations are now sealed and need to be declassified.
CS – Number 10; In 2004, New York firefighters Mike Bellone and Nicholas DeMasi went public to say they had found the black boxes at the World Trade Center, but were told to keep their mouths shut by FBI agents. Nicholas DeMasi said that he escorted federal agents on an all-terrain vehicle in October 2001 and helped them locate the devices, a story backed up by rescue volunteer Mike Bellone.
As the Philadelphia Daily News reported at the time, “Their story raises the question of whether there was a some type of cover-up at Ground Zero.”
CS – Number 11 – Hundreds of eye witnesses including first responders, fire captains, news reporters, and police, all described multiple explosions in both towers before and during the collapse.
CS – Number 12; An astounding video uncovered from the archives shows BBC News correspondent Jane Standley reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. Tapes from earlier BBC broadcasts show news anchors discussing the collapse of WTC 7 a full 26 minutes in advance. The BBC at first claimed that their tapes from 9/11 had been “lost” before admitting that they made the “error” of reporting the collapse of WTC 7 before it happened without adequately explaining how they could have obtained advance knowledge of the event.
In addition, over an hour before the collapse of WTC 7, at 4:10pm, CNN’s Aaron Brown reported that the building “has either collapsed, or is collapsing.”
CS – Number 13; Solicitor General Ted Olson’s claim that his wife Barbara Olsen called him twice from Flight 77, describing hijackers with box cutters, was a central plank of the official 9/11 story.
However, the credibility of the story was completely undermined after Olsen kept changing his story about whether his wife used her cell phone or the airplane phone. The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004. American Airlines confirmed that Flight 77 was a Boeing 757 and that this plane did not have airplane phones on board.
According to the FBI, Barbara Olsen attempted to call her husband only once and the call failed to connect, therefore Olsen must have been lying when he claimed he had spoken to his wife from Flight 77.
CS – Number 14; The size of a Boeing 757 is approximately 125ft in width and yet images of the impact zone at the Pentagon supposedly caused by the crash merely show a hole no more than 16ft in diameter. The engines of the 757 would have punctured a hole bigger than this, never mind the whole plane. Images before the partial collapse of the impact zone show little real impact damage and a sparse debris field completely inconsistent with the crash of a large jetliner, especially when contrasted with other images showing airplane crashes into buildings.
CS – Number 15; What is the meaning behind the following quote attributed to Dick Cheney which came to light during the 9/11 Commission hearings? The passage is taken from testimony given by then Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta.
During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, “The plane is 50 miles out.” “The plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to “the plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the Vice President, “Do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?”
As the plane was not shot down, in addition to the fact that armed fighter jets were nowhere near the plane and the Pentagon defensive system was not activated, are we to take it that the orders were to let the plane find its target?
CS – Number 16; In May 2003, the Miami Herald reported how the Bush administration was refusing to release a 900-page congressional report on 9/11 because it wanted to “avoid enshrining embarrassing details in the report,” particularly regarding pre-9/11 warnings as well as the fact that the hijackers were trained at U.S. flight schools.
CS – Number 17; Top Pentagon officials cancelled their scheduled flights for September 11th on September 10th. San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, following a security warning, cancelled a flight into New York that was scheduled for the morning of 9/11.
CS – Number 18; The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004, and even by that point it was only in the trial phase. Calls from cell phones which formed an integral part of the official government version of events were technologically impossible at the time.
CS – Number 19: On April 29, 2004, President Bush and V.P. Cheney would only meet with the commission under specific clandestine conditions. They insisted on testifying together and not under oath. They also demanded that their testimony be treated as a matter of “state secret.” To date, nothing they spoke of that day exists in the public domain.
CS – And finally Mr. President – Number 20; A few days after the attack, several newspapers as well as the FBI reported that a paper passport had been found in the ruins of the WTC. In August 2004, CNN reported that 9/11 hijacker Ziad Jarrah’s visa was found in the remains of Flight 93 which went down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
At least a third of the WTC victim’s bodies were vaporized and many of the victims of the Pentagon incident were burned beyond recognition. And yet visas and paper passports which identify the perpetrators and back up the official version of events miraculously survive explosions and fires that we are told melted steel buildings.
(The Senior aide appears again beside the President whispering in his ear. He then quickly moves off).
PBO – Well Charlie I can’t say this hasn’t been interesting. As I said earlier you’ve showed up today focused and organized. Regardless how I feel about the material you’ve presented, I must commend your dedication and zeal. However, our time here is up.
(the President rises from his chair , I do the same).
CS – Mr. President! One more second!
(The President starts towards the door – I follow him quickly step for step).
CS – Mr. President, I implore you based on the evidence you now possess, to use your Executive Power. Prove to us all Sir, that you do, in fact, care. Create a truly comprehensive and open Congressional investigation of 9/11 and its aftermath. The families deserve the truth, the American people and the rest of the free world deserve the truth. Mr. President -
(He pauses. We shake hands).
CS – Make sure your on the right side of history.
(The President breaks the handshake).
PBO – I am on the right side of history. Thank you Charlie, my staff and I will be in touch.
(I watch as he strides gracefully out of the room, the truth I provided him held firmly by his side; in the hand of providence.)
Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.
This is an open letter to the President requesting a new investigation.
Charlie Sheen.
Charlie Sheen is going to be on Alex Jones’ syndicated radio show live twice this week. This letter to the President is only the opening salvo in a chain of key events. Read more details here and tune in at 11am CST when Alex will lay out this exciting new development. Sheen first appeared on The Alex Jones Show in March 2006 to air his doubts about the official 9/11 story, an interview that garnered national attention and put the issue of 9/11 truth at the forefront of public debate.
————————————————————————————————————————
For media requests on this subject email sheen@infowars.com
A comprehensive bibliography containing all of the evidence presented above can be viewed at www.prisonplanet.com/20_minutes_bibliography.html
From PrisonPlanet.com:
I recently had the pleasure of sitting down with our 44th President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, while he was out promoting his health care reform initiative. I requested 30 minutes given the scope and detail of my inquiry; they said I could have 20. Twenty minutes, 1200 seconds, not a lot of time to question the President about one of the most important events in our nation’s history. The following is a transcript of our remarkable discussion.
————————————————————————————————————————
Charlie Sheen – Good afternoon Mr. President, thank you so much for taking time out of your demanding schedule.
President Barack Obama – My pleasure, the content of your request seemed like something I should carve out a few minutes for.
CS – I should point out that I voted for you, as your promises of hope and change, transparency and accountability, as well as putting government back into the hands of the American people, struck an emotional chord in me that I hadn’t felt in quite some time, perhaps ever.
PBO – And I appreciate that Charlie. Big fan of the show, by the way.
CS – Sir, I can’t imagine when you might find the time to actually watch my show given the measure of what you inherited.
PBO – I have it Tivo’d on Air Force One. Nice break from the traveling press corps. (He glances at his watch) not to be abrupt or to rush you, but you have 19 minutes left.
CS – I’ll take that as an invitation to cut to the chase.
PBO – I’m all ears. Or so I’ve been told.
CS – Sir, in the very near future we will be experiencing our first 9/11 anniversary with you as Commander in Chief.
PBO – Yes. A very solemn day for our Nation. A day of reflection and yet a day of historical consciousness as well.
CS – Very much so sir, very much so indeed…. Now; In researching your position regarding the events of 9/11 and the subsequent investigation that followed, am I correct to understand that you fully support and endorse the findings of the commission report otherwise known as the ‘official story’?
PBO – Do I have any reason not to? Given that most of us are presumably in touch with similar evidence.
CS – I really wish that were the case, sir. Are you aware, Mr. President, of the recent stunning revelations that sixty percent of the 9/11 commissioners have publicly stated that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11 and that the Pentagon was engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack?
PBO – I am aware of certain “in fighting” during the course of their very thorough and tireless investigative process.
CS – Mr. President, it’s hard to label this type of friction as “in fighting” or make the irresponsible leap to “thorough,” when the evidence I insist you examine regarding 6 of the 10 members are statements of fact.
(At this point one of Obama’s senior aides approaches the President and whispers into his ear. Obama glances quickly at his watch and nods as the aide resumes his post at the doorway, directly behind me.)
PBO – No disrespect Mr. Sheen, but I have to ask; what is it that you seem to be implying with the initial direction of this discussion?
CS – I am not implying anything Mr. President. I am here to present the facts and see what you plan to do with them.
PBO - Let me guess; your ‘facts,’ allegedly supporting these claims are in the folders you brought with you?
CS – Good guess Mr. President.
(I hand the first folder of documents to the President)
CS – Again sir, these are not my opinions or assumptions, this is all a matter of public record, reported through mainstream media, painstakingly fact checked and verified.
(the President glances into the folder I handed him)
CS – You’ll notice sir on page one of the dossier dated August of ‘06 from the Washington Post, the statements of John Farmer, senior council to the 9/11 commission, his quote stating, “I was shocked how different the truth was from the way it was described.”
PBO – (as he glances down at the report, almost inaudible) …. um hmm….
CS – He goes on to further state “The [NORAD Air Defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years….”
(the President continues to view the documents)
Charlie Sheen writing 20 Minutes with the President. Photo by Alex Jones. CS – On pages two and three, sir, are the statements, as well, from commission co-chairmen Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, commissioners Bob Kerrey, Timothy Roemer and John Lehman, as well as the statements of commissioner Max Cleland, an ex-Senator from Georgia , who resigned, stating:
“It is a national scandal. This investigation is now compromised. One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9/11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up.”
He also described President Bush’s desire to delay the process as not to damage the ‘04 re-election bid. They suspected deception to the point where they considered referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation. Mr. President, this information alone is unequivocally grounds for a new investigation!
PBO – Mistakes were clearly made but we as a people and as a country need to move forward. It is obviously in our best interest as a democratic society to focus our efforts and our resources on the future of this great nation and our ability to protect the American people and our allies from this type of terrorism in the coming years.
CS – Sir, how can we focus on the future when THE COMMISSION ITSELF is on record stating that they still do not know the truth??
PBO – Even if what you state, might in some capacity, begin to approach an open discussion or balanced debate, I can’t speak for, or about the decisions certain commission members made during an extremely difficult period. Perhaps you should be interviewing them instead of me. Wait, don’t tell me; I was easier to track down than they were?
CS - Not exactly sir, but let’s be honest. You’re the President of the United States, the leader of the free world, the buck stops with you. 9/11 has been the pretext for the systematic dismantling of our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Your administration is reading from the same playbook that the Bush administration foisted on America through documented secrecy and deception.
PBO – Mr. Sheen, I’m having a difficult time sitting here and listening to you draw distorted parallels between the Bush/Cheney regime and mine.
CS – Mr. President the parallels are not distorted just because you say they are. Let’s stick to the facts. You promised to abolish the Patriot Act and then voted to re-authorize it. You pledged to end warrantless wire tapping against the American people and now energetically defend it. You decried the practice of rendition and now continue it. You promised over and over again on the campaign trail, that you would end the practice of indefinite detention and instead, you have expanded it to permanent detention of “detainees” without trial. This far exceeds the outrages of the former administration. Call me crazy Mr. President, but is this not your record?
PBO – Mr. Sheen, my staff and I authorized this interview based on your request to discuss 9/11 and deliver some additional information you’re convinced I’d not previously reviewed. Call me crazy, But it appears as though you’ve blindly wandered off topic.
CS – Sir, the examples I just illustrated are a direct result of 9/11.
PBO – And I’m telling you that we must move forward, we must endure through these dangerous and politically challenging years ahead.
CS – Mr. President, we cannot move forward with a bottomless warren of unanswered questions surrounding that day and its aftermath.
PBO – I read the official report. Every word every page. Perhaps you should do the same.
CS – I have sir, and so have thousands of family members of the victims, and guess what; they have the same questions I do and probably a lot more. I didn’t lose a loved one on that horrific day Mr. President and neither did you. But since then I, along with millions of other Americans lost something we held true and dear for most of our lives in this great country of ours; we lost our hope.
PBO – And I’d like to believe that I am here to restore that hope. To restore confidence in your leaders, in the system that the voting public chose through a peaceful transfer of power.
(An odd moment of silence between us. Precious time ticking away).
CS – Mr. President, are you aware of the number of days it took to begin the investigation into JFK’s assassination?
PBO – If memory serves I believe it was two weeks.
CS – Close. Seventeen days to be exact. Are you aware sir, how long it took to begin the investigation into Pearl Harbor?
PBO – I would say again about….two weeks.
CS – Close again sir, eleven days to be exact. Are you aware Mr. President how long it took to begin the investigation into 9/11?
PBO – I know it must have seemed like a very long time for all the grieving families.
CS – It was a very long time Mr. President – four hundred and forty days. Roughly 14 months. Does it bother you Mr. President that it only took FIVE HOURS for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld after the initial attack to recommend and endorse a full scale offensive against Iraq?
PBO – I am not aware of any such purported claim.
CS – I have the proof Mr. President, along with scores of documents and facts I’d like you to take a look at. Here.
(I hand him another file – much thicker than the first)
PBO – I see you came prepared Charlie.
CS – No other way to show up Mr. President. When in doubt over prepare I always say.
PBO – Now you sound like the First Lady.
CS – That’s quite a compliment sir.
PBO – As you wish. Please continue.
CS – Sir, I’d like to direct your attention to the stack of documents in the folder I just handed you. The first in from the top is entitled “Operation Northwoods”, a declassified Pentagon plan to stage terror attacks on US soil, to be blamed on Cuba as a pretext for war.
PBO – And I’d like to direct your attention to the fact that the principle draftsman of this improbable blueprint was quickly denied a second term as Joint Chiefs chairman and sent packing to a European NATO garrison. Thank God his otherworldly ambitions never saw the light of day.
CS – I wouldn’t be so certain about that Mr. President.
PBO – I could easily say the same to you Charlie.
(the President checks his watch)
CS – The next document reads “Declassified staged provocations.” Now, Honestly Mr. President I wish I was making this stuff up. I’m certain you are familiar with the USS Maine Incident, the sinking of the Lusitania, which we all now know brought us into WW1, and of course the most famous, the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
PBO – Of course I am familiar with these historical events and I’m aware that there’s a measure of controversy surrounding them. But to be quite frank with you, this is all ancient history.
CS – Mr. President, it has been often said; “Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.” And I concede to you sir, these events are the past.
PBO – A vastly different world young man, shouldering a radically disparate state of universal affairs.
CS – No argument sir, I‘m merely inviting you to acknowledge some credibility to the pattern or the theme. Case in point; the next document in your folder. It was published by the think-tank, Project For a New American Century and it’s entitled “Rebuilding Americas Defenses”, and was written by Dick Cheney and Jeb Bush. To quote from the document sir – (the President interrupts)
PBO – “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”
CS РTouch̩, sir. Your thoughts on this statement Mr. President?
PBO – I would call this a blatant case of misjudgment fueled by an unfortunate milieu of assumption. For some, the uninformed denial of coincidence.
CS – Interesting angle sir. Nevertheless, Vice President Cheney didn’t stop there. In early 2008, Pulitzer prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh and MSNBC, both reported that Cheney had proposed to the Pentagon an outrageous plan to have the U.S. Navy create fake Iranian patrol boats, to be manned by Navy Seals, who would then stage an attack on US destroyers in the Strait of Hormuz. This event was to be blamed on Iran and used as a pretext for war. Does any of this information worry you Mr. President? Should we just ignore it, until these realities can be dismissed years from now by our children, as ancient history as well?
PBO – Of course this information worries me, yet it’s not nearly as worrisome as you sitting here today suspiciously implying that 9/11 was somehow allowed to happen or even orchestrated from the inside.
CS – Mr. President I am not suspiciously implying anything. I am merely exposing the documents and asking the questions that nobody in power will even look at or acknowledge. And as I stated earlier, I voted for you, I believed in your message of hope and change. Mr. President I have come to you specifically hoping for a change. A change in the perception that our government has not yet made itself open and accountable to the people. These are your words Mr. President not mine. The lives of thousands were brutally cut short and those left behind to suffer their infinite pain are with me today Mr. President. They are with me in spirit and flesh, and the message we carry will not be silenced anymore by media fueled mantras insisting how they are supposed to feel. Deciding for them, for 8 long years, what can be thought, what can be said, what can be asked.
PBO – And I appreciate your passion, I appreciate your conviction. In spite of your concerns, in spite of what your data might or might not reveal, what you and the families must understand and accept is that we are doing everything we can to protect you.
CS – Mr. President , I realize were very short on time, so please allow me to run down a list of bullet points that might illuminate some reasons why we don’t embrace the warm hug of Federal protection.
PBO – We’ve come this far. Fire away.
CS – Please keep in mind Mr. President everything I’m about to say is documented as fact and part of the public record. The information you are holding in your hands chronicles and verifies each and every point.
PBO – You have five minutes left. The floor is yours. Brief me.
CS – Thank you Mr. President. Okay, first; On the FBI’s most wanted list Osama Bin Laden is not charged with the crimes of 911. When I called the FBI to ask them why this was the case, they replied: “There’s not enough evidence to link Bin Laden to the crime scene,” I later discovered he had never even been indicted by the D.O.J.
CS – Number 2; FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, was dismissed and gagged by the D.O.J. after she revealed that the government had foreknowledge of plans to attack American cities using planes as bombs as early as April 2001. In July of ‘09, Mrs. Edmonds broke the Federal gag order and went public to reveal that Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and the Taliban were all working for and with the C.I.A. up until the day of 9/11.
CS – Number 3; The following is a quote from Mayor Giuliani during an interview on 9/11 with Peter Jennings for ABC News. “I went down to the scene and we set up headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse. And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit and got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us.”
WHO TOLD HIM THIS??? To this day, the answer to this question remains unanswered, completely ignored and emphatically DENIED by Mayor Giuliani on several public occasions.
CS – Number 4; In April 2004, USA Today reported, “In the two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the North American Aerospace Defense Command conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties.” One of the targets was the World Trade Center.
CS – Number 5; On September 12th 2007, CNN’s ‘Anderson Cooper 360’, reported that the mysterious “white plane” spotted and videotaped by multiple media outlets, flying in restricted airspace over the White House shortly before 10am on the morning of 9/11, was in fact the Air Force’s E-4B, a specially modified Boeing 747 with a communications pod behind the cockpit; otherwise known as “The Doomsday Plane”.
Though fully aware of the event, the 9/11 Commission did not deem the appearance of the military plane to be of any interest and did not include it in the final 9/11 Commission report.
CS – Number 6; Three F-16s assigned to Andrews Air Force Base, ten miles from Washington, DC, are conducting training exercises in North Carolina 207 miles away as the first plane crashes into the WTC. Even at significantly less than their top speed of 1500 mph, they could still have defended the skies over Washington well before 9am, more than 37 minutes before Flight 77 crashes into the Pentagon, however, they did not return until after 9:55am.
Andrews AFB had no armed fighters on alert and ready to take off on the morning of 9/11.
CS – Number 7; WTC Building 7. Watch the video of its collapse.
CS – Number 8; Flight 93 is fourth plane to crash on 9/11 at 10:03am. V.P. Cheney only gives shoot down order at 10:10-10:20am and this is not communicated to NORAD until 28 minutes after Flight 93 has crashed.
Fueling further suspicion on this front is the fact that three months before the attacks of 9/11, Dick Cheney usurped control of NORAD, and therefore he, and no one else on planet Earth, had the power to call for military sorties on the hijacked airliners on 9/11. He did not exercise that power. Three months after 9/11, he relinquished command of NORAD and returned it to military operation.
CS – Number 9; Scores of main stream news outlets reported that the F.B.I. conducted an investigation of at least FIVE of the 9/11 hijackers being trained at U.S. military flight schools. Those investigations are now sealed and need to be declassified.
CS – Number 10; In 2004, New York firefighters Mike Bellone and Nicholas DeMasi went public to say they had found the black boxes at the World Trade Center, but were told to keep their mouths shut by FBI agents. Nicholas DeMasi said that he escorted federal agents on an all-terrain vehicle in October 2001 and helped them locate the devices, a story backed up by rescue volunteer Mike Bellone.
As the Philadelphia Daily News reported at the time, “Their story raises the question of whether there was a some type of cover-up at Ground Zero.”
CS – Number 11 – Hundreds of eye witnesses including first responders, fire captains, news reporters, and police, all described multiple explosions in both towers before and during the collapse.
CS – Number 12; An astounding video uncovered from the archives shows BBC News correspondent Jane Standley reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. Tapes from earlier BBC broadcasts show news anchors discussing the collapse of WTC 7 a full 26 minutes in advance. The BBC at first claimed that their tapes from 9/11 had been “lost” before admitting that they made the “error” of reporting the collapse of WTC 7 before it happened without adequately explaining how they could have obtained advance knowledge of the event.
In addition, over an hour before the collapse of WTC 7, at 4:10pm, CNN’s Aaron Brown reported that the building “has either collapsed, or is collapsing.”
CS – Number 13; Solicitor General Ted Olson’s claim that his wife Barbara Olsen called him twice from Flight 77, describing hijackers with box cutters, was a central plank of the official 9/11 story.
However, the credibility of the story was completely undermined after Olsen kept changing his story about whether his wife used her cell phone or the airplane phone. The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004. American Airlines confirmed that Flight 77 was a Boeing 757 and that this plane did not have airplane phones on board.
According to the FBI, Barbara Olsen attempted to call her husband only once and the call failed to connect, therefore Olsen must have been lying when he claimed he had spoken to his wife from Flight 77.
CS – Number 14; The size of a Boeing 757 is approximately 125ft in width and yet images of the impact zone at the Pentagon supposedly caused by the crash merely show a hole no more than 16ft in diameter. The engines of the 757 would have punctured a hole bigger than this, never mind the whole plane. Images before the partial collapse of the impact zone show little real impact damage and a sparse debris field completely inconsistent with the crash of a large jetliner, especially when contrasted with other images showing airplane crashes into buildings.
CS – Number 15; What is the meaning behind the following quote attributed to Dick Cheney which came to light during the 9/11 Commission hearings? The passage is taken from testimony given by then Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta.
During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, “The plane is 50 miles out.” “The plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to “the plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the Vice President, “Do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?”
As the plane was not shot down, in addition to the fact that armed fighter jets were nowhere near the plane and the Pentagon defensive system was not activated, are we to take it that the orders were to let the plane find its target?
CS – Number 16; In May 2003, the Miami Herald reported how the Bush administration was refusing to release a 900-page congressional report on 9/11 because it wanted to “avoid enshrining embarrassing details in the report,” particularly regarding pre-9/11 warnings as well as the fact that the hijackers were trained at U.S. flight schools.
CS – Number 17; Top Pentagon officials cancelled their scheduled flights for September 11th on September 10th. San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, following a security warning, cancelled a flight into New York that was scheduled for the morning of 9/11.
CS – Number 18; The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004, and even by that point it was only in the trial phase. Calls from cell phones which formed an integral part of the official government version of events were technologically impossible at the time.
CS – Number 19: On April 29, 2004, President Bush and V.P. Cheney would only meet with the commission under specific clandestine conditions. They insisted on testifying together and not under oath. They also demanded that their testimony be treated as a matter of “state secret.” To date, nothing they spoke of that day exists in the public domain.
CS – And finally Mr. President – Number 20; A few days after the attack, several newspapers as well as the FBI reported that a paper passport had been found in the ruins of the WTC. In August 2004, CNN reported that 9/11 hijacker Ziad Jarrah’s visa was found in the remains of Flight 93 which went down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
At least a third of the WTC victim’s bodies were vaporized and many of the victims of the Pentagon incident were burned beyond recognition. And yet visas and paper passports which identify the perpetrators and back up the official version of events miraculously survive explosions and fires that we are told melted steel buildings.
(The Senior aide appears again beside the President whispering in his ear. He then quickly moves off).
PBO – Well Charlie I can’t say this hasn’t been interesting. As I said earlier you’ve showed up today focused and organized. Regardless how I feel about the material you’ve presented, I must commend your dedication and zeal. However, our time here is up.
(the President rises from his chair , I do the same).
CS – Mr. President! One more second!
(The President starts towards the door – I follow him quickly step for step).
CS – Mr. President, I implore you based on the evidence you now possess, to use your Executive Power. Prove to us all Sir, that you do, in fact, care. Create a truly comprehensive and open Congressional investigation of 9/11 and its aftermath. The families deserve the truth, the American people and the rest of the free world deserve the truth. Mr. President -
(He pauses. We shake hands).
CS – Make sure your on the right side of history.
(The President breaks the handshake).
PBO – I am on the right side of history. Thank you Charlie, my staff and I will be in touch.
(I watch as he strides gracefully out of the room, the truth I provided him held firmly by his side; in the hand of providence.)
Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.
This is an open letter to the President requesting a new investigation.
Charlie Sheen.
Charlie Sheen is going to be on Alex Jones’ syndicated radio show live twice this week. This letter to the President is only the opening salvo in a chain of key events. Read more details here and tune in at 11am CST when Alex will lay out this exciting new development. Sheen first appeared on The Alex Jones Show in March 2006 to air his doubts about the official 9/11 story, an interview that garnered national attention and put the issue of 9/11 truth at the forefront of public debate.
————————————————————————————————————————
For media requests on this subject email sheen@infowars.com
A comprehensive bibliography containing all of the evidence presented above can be viewed at www.prisonplanet.com/20_minutes_bibliography.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
