Terrorism by Sexual Humiliation

TSA: The Systematic Humiliation of American Citizens, and the Jews Behind It

The terrorists have won. And they are the TSA.

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has been transformed into Terroristm by Sexual Assault. Internet news and blog sites are now flooded with stories and debates over the backscatter porno scanners at the airports, and the punishing direct touching of sexual organs of individuals who "opt-out", be they men, women, or children. The employees of the TSA have become legalized felony sex offenders. Millions of United States passengers are now victims of sexual humiliation.

I received an emailed article today that has been the "straw that broke the camel's back". The story was written by a young mother who boarded an airport in Dayton, Ohio with her infant, and with her she had a bottle of breast milk. Because she had flown before she knew she would be called to step aside with the breast milk for a routine that has already been degrading enough since Americans lost their backbone on 9/11/01. She wrote the following excerpt of the physical "search" preformed on her by a female TSA employee:

She patted my left arm, my right arm, my upper back and my lower back. She then said, “I need to reach in and feel along the inside of your waistband.”

She felt along my waistline, moved behind me, then proceeded to feel both of my buttocks. She reached from behind in the middle of my buttocks towards my vagina area.

She did not tell me that she was going to touch my buttocks, or reach forward to my vagina area.

She then moved in front of my and touched the top and underneath portions of both of my breasts.

She did not tell me that she was going to touch my breasts.

She then felt around my waist. She then moved to the bottoms of my legs.

She then felt my inner thighs and my vagina area, touching both of my labia.

She did not tell me that she was going to touch my vagina area or my labia.

She then told me that I could put my shoes on and I asked if I could pick up the baby, she replied Yes.

She then moved back to my belongings to finish scanning them with the paper discs for explosives. When she finished she said I was free to go.

I stood there holding my baby in shock. I did not move for almost a minute.

I stood there, an American citizen, a mom traveling with a baby with special needs formula, sexually assaulted by a government official. I began shaking and felt completely violated, abused and assaulted by the TSA agent. I shook for several hours, and woke up the next day shaking.

This woman was essentially raped.

I am withholding this young woman's blog address as she has expressed the wish to protect her family, but at the same time has a need to warn people.

How many other passengers have had their travel experiences trashed on account of the emotional trauma of sexual violation? How many will carry both the emotional and physical memory of being touched or x-rayed through their clothing for some pervert's viewing for years to come, even the rest of their lives. Later in this mother's post she states she intends to use counseling services for her traumatic experience and it will be paid for by the TSA. The Terrorists by Sexual Assault.

With this story in front of me, 9-11-01 no longer means a damned thing to me. 9-11 has been turned into nothing but a shtick to gain ultimate control over the Citizens of the United States.

Deliberate violation of peoples' sexual privacy is an act of power over. Sexual predators hold emotional power over most of their victims forever. Predators are repeat offenders, even if they commit their crime no more than once, for the memory of their crime recurs in mind, emotional, and/or bodily memory of the victim throughout their lives. Ask any victim of rape how she or he feels about sex with a loved one after the crime. Ask elderly people who remember being molested as children how their experience affected their lives. Even people who were violated at such a young age they have no conscious memories later develop personality disorders that rob them of normal living for decades. All victims of sexual offenses battle the demons inserted by their perpetrators for untold lengths of time.

The employees of the TSA have been transformed into organized ritual abuse sex offenders. All of them. The whole point of sexually assaulting passenger in the "pat down" is to punish and force people to walk through the XXX-ray scanners. This is about mass control in the worst way.


Chester the Molester

Who would be attracted to this kind of employment? Who would be attracted to apply for a job where he or she would sit if front of a computer screen leering at the images of one naked body after another for hours a day? Who would be attracted to a position where they would put their hands onto the bodies of numerous people, their breasts, their buttocks, their penises, and their vaginas? Who would do such a thing? And who would do it for any amount of money? Even of children? There are now hundreds, if not thousands of personal accounts, both written and video, exposing the abusive attitudes of TSA personnel, including one where a man beat his own chest and yelled, "I have power! I have power!"

Exactly. TSA cannot possibly attract workers who have any real consciences. The TSA attracts people who seek to exert their power over other people. Sure, TSA can do criminal background checks and exclude people who have felonies of sex offenses. But they can't exclude the people who have escaped discovery by courts of law. How many victims of sexual offenses have never turned in their molesters or rapists? How many never speak of the offense their whole lives? Theirs are the predators free to work at the TSA. Those are the men and women who stare at your body if you are coerced into stepping in the the scanner. Those are the men and women who touch your private parts, and touch your children should you refuse the scanner. Six in one, half a dozen in the other: It's all criminal.

What is the illegality of sexual assault? There are different levels of assault. There's one called a "simple" assault. If you touch another person in a non-sexual way and they don't want you to touch them, you just committed a misdemeanor should they decide to press charges. Try touching a cop and see what happens.

Sexual assault is non-consensual sexual contact. Wait a minute--the TSA states that when you purchase a flight ticket, you consent to having your naked image viewed or your body touched. WRONG. Any form of coercion, including the requirement of submission to this kind of search, nullifies "consent". Travelers are being blackmailed into choosing one basic human right at the expense of another: Airline customers are now being forced to choose between their right to freedom of movement by means accessible to them (including public transportation such as flying) and their right to privacy. Choosing to eat over being housed, or being housed over being able to eat is not a choice. It is the loss of human dignity either way. Having to give up the right to one's own sexual privacy so that they can travel a long distance by air is not a choice. It is an abusive situation. This is not consent. It's coercion. Airline customers now must choose between the right to privacy or the right to freedom of movement. Imagine how travelers who must fly to a funeral today are forced to add sexual trauma to their pain of grief.

Aggravated sexual assault involves violence. This is a felony. Yes, there now more passengers who have submitted to searches who have gotten the hell beat out of them by exuberant TSA thugs. As bad as this is, there is one level of this felony people often forget. Any sexual touching of a child 14 or 13 (depending on the state) and under is a felony offense. That means every TSA employee that has put their hands onto the bodies of children to search them has committed a felony. Not all pedophiles get caught. Most of them don't. Just ask their adult victims.

Imagine what is happening to flyers who are themselves victims of previous sex crimes. Every one of them is being re-traumatized. Beyond them, more victims are being created every time another person stands in a scanner or stands for physical assault. Do TSA workers ever wonder if one of their victims will remember their name and look them up?

Why hold the TSA employees responsible? They are "only doing their job". That's what they said at Nuremberg. What was the response of Nuremberg when Nazi soldier said they were "only following orders"? Should all employees do whatever their supervisors tell them to do, no matter how criminal the act? Ever hear of Refuseniks? Even Israel has refuseniks. Some US soldiers refused to fight in an illegal war in Iraq. If the TSA employers told their workers to steal from passengers, lowlifes the bunch of them are, they'd do that, too.

Why would TSA employees do this to American citizens? I've been to many airports in cities. Chicago, DC, New York--could it be the minorities that work there take delight in inflicting their angry harm on mostly white passenger who have the funds to fly while they don't? Certainly, jealousy (another word for greed) is a powerful emotion--powerful enough to turn a government employee into a criminal. How much do gropers and leering predators get paid? Enough to afford a plane ticket? Hardly.

I have another observation about this. A few days ago I stopped for gas at one of the cheapest stations in an area where there is a high population of Hispanics and Muslims. Every time I go, most of the customers are Hispanic, many Arab, and the people who own the pumps are Middle Eastern. On top of their pumps is a small placard advertising jobs with the TSA. An add located in an area frequented mostly by foreigners. Yes, there are a lot of foreigners working the airports that I use. How is it in high alert years that the US government would exponentially increase the employment of foreign-born people's, especially while US Citizens lose their jobs? These people don't care about Americans. They are not from here. They are paid mercenaries. I'm seeing a lot of articles on the internet where Muslim women are allowed to avoid both the scanner and the extremely invasive search while American passengers are forced into it. Americans are specifically being singled out.


Who Would Dream Up Such a System of Invasion of Privacy?

How about two Jews?--Michael Chertoff and Janet Napolitano

Did the prono screeners come about because of the underwear bomber? Think again. Think sex, money, and power. Dual citizen of Israel, Michael Chertoff, former head of the FBI and the Department of Homeland "Security" ordered the first batch of naked body screeners in 2005. That was FIVE YEARS before the underwear bomber. Chertoff retained this company, Rapiscan past his DHS appointment as his client of his consulting firm, Chertoff Group (or should I say grope?) With their foot in the government's door, Chertoff used his former titles to expand their business and the prostitution dollars in his own pocket. Chertoff, the Israeli citizen, is using his high level, American-tax funded positions to bring about a widespread sexual invasion of privacy against the American public while he lines his pockets. Chertoff has gained this power over the American public through the constant fear-mongering inflicted on American since 9-11.

You gain power over others through fear. Fear of another terrorist attack, fear of anthrax, fear of bird flu, fear of mad cow disease, fear of swine flu, fear of the DC snipers, fear of the mortgage crisis, fear of financial collapse, fear of the shoe bomber, fear of the underwear bomber. If you want power over others, you never let up on inflicting fear. And if you really want power, you sexualize it. This is what Michael Chertoff, former director of the Department of Homeland Security has done to the American people.

Janet Napolitano is telling American citizens if they don't want to submit to coercive sexual invasion, then they can choose not to fly. Amazingly, she was the attorney who represented sexual assault victim, Anita Hill, during the Clarence Thomas hearings. If anyone should know about the traumatizing effects of unwanted sexual touching or leering, it's this woman. That she would tell airline customers to submit or get off is breathtaking. Is that not how predators treat their victims?

With an attitude like that it is no surprise she was chosen to succeed Michael Chertoff. It disgusts me that a graduate of the University of Virgina, founded by Thomas Jefferson, would have no sense of constitutional, civil, or basic human rights. She must have studied them so that she could deny them. However, being a descendant from both parents of a tribe that ritualizes blood sexual humiliation of all its male infants, it's clear she has an agenda of control over the innocents of America. By supporting sexual predation at the airports, she is a predator herself.

What does the Jewish religion have to do with sexual predation? One hell of a lot. These are people who have for thousands of years unified themselves in a most disgusting way--by amputating the foreskins of all of their own sons. Until recently, circumcisions have been done without anesthesia, for circumcisers didn't' believe infants had feelings, or if they did, would not remember it. All bodies retain the memory of physical trauma whether or not the brain has developed to a stage to mentally remember or make sense of it or not. In fact, pre-lingual traumas can be the worst kind for human beings grow up not understanding what is wrong with them.

But the mothers of circumcised infants do remember. They do not protect their own birth children from the knifing of the most painful and humiliating kind. Mothers are supposed to protect their babies from harm. Yet, Jewish mothers promote the worst harm of all.

Victims often become predators. It is no wonder the entire Jewish race is so messed up. It is no wonder they are most always involved one way or another in violent conflicts such as the genocide of the Palestinians, or inflicting and promoting sexual humiliation of non-Jews through the Jewish-dominated pornography business, or continue to participate in human trafficking of Eastern European women into sexual slavery in Israel, or poisoning the minds of Westerners against family integrity and marriage commitments through their control of television and Hollywood. It is no wonder they co-created and promoted the legalization of sexual offense at our nation's airports.

And it is no wonder Jews are known for the intensity of their audacious greed. Holding money is a way to hold power--and they aren't just greedy for money. Money is not enough. Having power over other people is the endgame. Setting up backscatter scanners all across the United States and Europe is not just about making money, although profit is part of it. Obtaining power over masses of other people in the most effective way is the real goal: Power over through sexual humiliation.

What is Really Being "Sacrificed"?

"There has to be some sacrifice", we are being told. Sacrifice for what? Of what? The loss of sexual and personal safety in exchange for safety? The loss of on of the most basic human rights in order to enjoy another basic human right? How about the US Government stop making enemies around the world, meanwhile target-search only those people who would be dangerous?

I'll tell you what's being sacrificed: The American People as a whole. We are being turned into a nation of sexually traumatized victims. This form of humiliation is now affecting millions of people.

One way to destroy a people is to destroy their pride as a people. Overt war doesn't work as well as covert humiliation. Victims of war will rally together, help each other, share their pain with one another, vow to stand up to their enemies together, even be identified internationally as a group of people through their experiences as victims. Yet, history demonstrates that the very worst of war experiences are not the deaths, but the humiliation victims experience at the hands of their perpetrators. The worst kind of humiliation is sexual, especially if it is public. This is the reason the United Nations have come to define rape as a form of torture. Gang rape, for example, is a way to degrade and destroy not only the victim, but her people as well.

Mass sexual humiliation programs an entire generation of people to feel shame. Sexual trauma is a form of brainwash, and in fact is often used along with other forms of torture for brainwash. Sexual trauma is hypnotic. The effects last for generations. Mass trauma in a shameful way at the hands of dark forces changes the way a whole group of people sees itself--and that view is one of a loss of self-respect. This is what happens to individual victims of sexual violence, and it happens to whole groups of people who are victims together. Individual victims of sexual violence experience long-term, often lifelong shame, depression, anxiety, unexplained fears, low-self esteem, loss of personal pride, loss of trust, loss of safety, loss of identity--the list of profound change is endless. The worst crimes that can be committed against human beings are those that target humiliation. Victims live, most often silently, in the shadow of shame. Their lives are poisoned, and the poison spreads to those around them.

Victims of sexual humiliation have had the reverence for their lives striped from them, and they often feel they can never rebuild a life of reverence. Since 9-11-01, we Americans have lost so much regard for ourselves as a people in the face of constant re-traumatizing with the latest fear. The numbness such constant terrorizing of us by our own government and its lapdog media is deliberate--all for the purpose of controlling all of us. Topping it off with sanctioned sexual terror of mostly the middle class at the airports is intended to render us helpless and transform our numbness into deep shame. Silence all too often comes with sexual shame. It is in being profoundly silenced we will ultimately lose ourselves as a people, and as a nation.

Silence is never golden. We must not submit to the US Government's infliction of psychic trauma upon our entire citizenry. We must stop the literal striping of our rights, one by one. None of us can stop this monster alone. We have to band together and refuse to be separated. The line in the sands are not between American across political lines. The real line is the one between our nation's people and the people who have usurped the powers of our government. Anything that does not honor our long history of the American People with Backbone must cease. For ourselves, for our children, and for future generations, we must collectively take a brave stand.

Obama Demands ALL Political Prisoners be Released

Obama Demands "that ALL Political Prisoners Be Released, Not Just One"

Tonight's MSNBC News televised the release of Aung San Suu Kyi, the pro-Democracy leader of Myanmar. Across all media reports, Obama refers to Kyi as "a hero of mine". Public comments and blogs are already pointing out that statement to be a curious statement for a president who is accused of being a foreigner and Muslim while showing favoritism to southeast Asian people, many of whom are Muslim.

The kicker comes with the so far very little reported statement by Obama that ALL political prisoners be released, not just one.

HELLO?? Guantanamo? Where was the promised "change" regarding the prisoners in Guantanamo? In fact, the United States has quite a history of political imprisonment and false accusations against its own American citizens! How about the falsely accused Edgar J. Steele? Or David Lane, who died in prison and was kept there as an example to anyone who would speak out for the rights of people because they are White? Our own David Duke was a target for political imprisonment as he dedicated his life to expose Jewish supremacist and their hold on power over the rest of America, as well as Europe.

How about Obama step up and demand the liberation of Vincent Reynouard, politically imprisoned in France for heretical opinions? His only "weapon" was a pen. Revisionist research and discussion of the Holocaust from any but the official view is punishable in most European countries with time behind iron. That's political imprisonment. Where was Obama when Ernst Zundel was finally released from political imprisonment in Germany? Seventy-four year old Horst Mahler is likely behind bars with a 12-year sentence, revenge for insulting Jewish Michel Friedman, former VP of the Central Council of Jews in Germany. There was Brad Love and Terry Tremaine of Canada, and David Irving of the UK.

ALL political prisoners? I'd like to see this community organizer in Chief hold true to that one!

"Multicultural Transformation": Code for Jewish Genocide of Europeans

This past week a friend sent me a short video interview of an American Jewess in Sweden seeking to erase Swedish culture by making the Swedes and all of Europe more "multicultural". Today, I found the same video is spectacularly discussed and produced by David Duke in his own video. Barbara Lerner Spectre (any relation to Arlen?) forewarns that "without that transformation", which will most certainly be "led" by the Jewish race, "Europe will not survive".

Just how is it that a people who have existed for 40,000 years will not survive if they do not surrender their social and racial identity as a people? I take Ms. Spectre's words to be a direct threat to the existence of Europeans. Exactly how is it that 800 million people are going to "transform" to conform to this Jewish woman's expectations?

I'll tell you how--I'll tell you what she is not telling you. The Jewish plans to "transform" the European people will happen in no way except through massive violence and force.

Just who exactly gets to decide how Europeans live their lives and express their cultures? This lady seems to thing Jews get to make that call. I believe they call this Chutzpah.

Let me present the following disquisition: I first want to set straight some of the terminologies we have in our political lexicon. There is one thing I hate and that's the misuse of words to mean things they don't. Though the average person doesn't engage this with malicious intent, the originators and many of the messengers of such misused word do.

The first word is "diversity". According to my Webster's (and yes, I look 'em up the old fashioned way--by flipping open a page), "diverse" translates: "differing from one another; UNLIKE; composed of distinct elements or qualities". "Diversity" translates as "the condition of being different; VARIETY; an instance or a point of difference".

The next word is "multiculturalism". Now, would you believe that word has been in existence for such short time it's not even in my 1983 collegiate dictionary? I actually have to look it up online. It's "the doctrine that several different cultures (rather than one national culture) can coexist peacefully and equitably in a single country."

It can? Has anyone been to America lately? Things aren't going so well here, I'm afraid to tell. If you keep your eyes peeled for CNN (Crap, Not News) or Faux News, we're about to explode into all out racial wars over here. But that's the point of it all.

The thinly veiled intentions of multiculturalism isn't a bunch of different cultures peaceably sharing a neighborhood together, but to eventually create a racially and politically monoculture out of all these people--and everyone knows this. "Monoculturalism" is what is meant by "multiculturalism". The erasure of all those differing cultures has a name: Genocide.

In fact, it's historically demonstrated, repeatedly, that "multicultural" states collapse on themselves, most of the time in violence, as with Yugoslavia, Rhodesia, and now South Africa. Sometimes, as with the former Soviet Union, they are maintained via violence. Different groups of people don't want to give themselves up to this--and they shouldn't have to!

We are lead to misbelieve that groups of people whose social identities, religious beliefs, and world views are completely unrelated will take the advice of Rodney King and "all just get along". And Jews believe they are just the people to pull this off. The only way to create this imagined "world" is to destroy individuality.

I have news: It ain't gonna happen. The human spirit is far too powerful to submit to the death of creativity. People will give up their physical lives before living in that world. I'm one of them.

Diversity is not a modern concept to which we all must elevate ourselves. Diversity already exists; in fact it has always been a fact of life for human beings. Even in places where people are thought to be homogeneous diversity is the reality. People differ by gender, regions, age, socio-economic status, profession, political views. Even our perceptions of all those things differ between us.

Of all the world's peoples, there is no group that is as diverse as the people of European ancestry. We are so different among our group that we are the most individualistic people on earth. It is who we are. It is also the reason we have a hard time "sticking together" as the Jews do far beyond even national and linguistic boundaries. Just in Europe there are 50 countries and over 100 languages, many that are endangered. European eye and hair coloring run the full gamut of the human rainbow. These are just among the White people. Red hair and features, according to the National Geographic, stand to fall extinct in less than a century when they had been very common until one or two generations ago.

Go to China and try to find the same level of diversity. Go to Africa and try to find the same level of diversity among the Negros. Even in all of South and Central America, the primary language spoken across nations is Spanish. If American Israelis like Barbara Spectre want to "transform" a continent to one that is multicultural, they have landed on the wrong shores. She needs to go back to the Middle East and start with Israel, one of the most racist nations on the planet. Her own people are carrying out genocide against people who have always been there because they are different from Spectre's people. Once she has success there, I'm sure she would be welcomed to "transform" the Chinese, who are about the most undiverse people I can imagine.

Europe already has diversity. Europe already has extremely heterogenous realities across essentially one race. People of European descent are so different from one another in part because of our deeply individualistic natures. We are very individualistic thinkers.

When you get a room full of a hundred independent thinkers together, you are faced with a hundred different ways of thinking. There is no people on earth more pluralistic than people of European blood. Yet, there seems to be a no more homogeneous group of people than Jews. They stick together even more than Chinese people do. Yet, White people are blamed en mass for the psychopathic crimes of Jews, easily done for they are similar in coloring and features. The intended effect of that projected blame is to weaken the Jews' perceived enemy--us. Jews get away with this because European peoples are so diverse and independent they forget to look out for one another. Those who do look out for other Europeans are shouted down with the vile epithet, "racist". No other people go through this abuse.

There are major problems with diversity. Diverse groups do not trust one another. Under the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, people did not trust one another. They couldn't--in a matter of 50 years from the first of Bolshevik control and all through the gulag years, 60 million were murdered. Intended death sort of has that effect on people. In America, criminality among African Americans is so prevalent (half of all the males have been behind bars) and European Americans have much lower crime statistics. Interracial crimes involving Blacks and Whites are caused almost exclusively perpetrated by Blacks. The lack of trust between Blacks and Whites is profound. Except here, lacking trust is a Black man's entitlement and a White man's "racism". How does that happen? The divisiveness is intended by certain elites with far too much power.

Why the push to "diversify" and already diverse Europe? To destroy actual European diversity. I'll go one farther: To destroy European peoples. What is the intermediate aim by promoting this "diversity"? To impose a homogeneous political space; to submit to the political prison of destroyed social realities. This is ethnic cleansing to say the least. That European peoples value their own individualistic thinking, creativity, and varieties of living is a direct threat to the now overt control Jews have exerted over Europe since at least the lifetime of their hero, Karl Marx.

The Mistreatment of Christians

I've never been an atheist. I'm agnostic. I don't believe Jesus was "God". I don't even have an answer to who or what God is, or even that God really exists. No one does, and that's why this is about beliefs, faith. Atheists can't prove anything either. They believe there is no God. They can't prove it--they just believe they are right. They are just as crazy as the people they point their fingers at. I don't have a problem with religion as long as it's supportive of people; as long as they help human rights. Not all, but a lot of atheists have entered into the realm of denying the right of human expression to people they disagree with. Many say they are "humanists", but I'll argue that because of their mistreatment of Christians they are not. It's one thing to disagree with Christians, but to make fun of them or put them down is to behave exactly in the way we are trying to prevent.

One thing I am is pro-American and pro-Westernization--that is, in our own (Western) corner of the world. Most Westerners are Christian. I think something like 70% or more of Americans identify as Christian, and because Christians have long been flexible about laws and freedoms, I oppose the repression of them by non-Christians. The rest of us ought to know better than to try to take away freedom of religion. The operative word is "of". Not instead of, or without. Argument and debates are fine. Establishing laws against the first amendment is another matter--which is just what has happened in the past three or four decades.

I spend my time looking for truths. There are clues of it everywhere. I find specs of it in any culture, any religion, any political line of thinking, etc. Because I'm a Westerner, I can "speak Christianity" as a language. I will include many different views on any given subject. In the subject of money, yes, I often go to the bible to look for what is there because in Westernization that is one of the uniforms of thoughts used in understanding the ethics around money issues. For example--we have some really corrupt people in the highest levels of government and banking institutions, people the rest of us can't get at, can't fire, and even have a hard time identifying. They are snakes in suits--predators (there's a book by that name). The rest of us who would not do those kinds of things to other people need to understand how they do this to us if we want to stop our being controlled. We have to become as wise as snakes--not to become snakes, but to know what they know. As far as I'm concerned, the bible gives a good example of explaining this, and I don't think I should overlook it just because my beliefs are different from the intentions of Christianity.

Liberals and Their Hatred of Blue-Eyed People, and Social Identity

A friend of mine wrote me about a conflict in his family over his desire to see white people continue on as a race. He made the best effort he could to explain his views A relative, apparently a liberal, responded with enormous sarcasm, and said some things that, frankly, I thought were pretty extreme and uncalled for. I thought about what my response might be.

A multitude of thoughts come to mind.

I have two friends who are a gay couple. I believe they are born that way. That's a whole discussion in itself. They used to live for many years just outside of DC. They are very social and have countless friends and a lot of people know them. But a few years ago they decided to relocated to a town near the beach. What is special about this town and nearby areas is that there is a large gay population, like San Fransisco. When white people do this, it's called "white flight". But the point is to show that gay people, like everyone else, want to be among people who are like themselves. They don't mind being with people different, but if they don't get to be among people like themselves most of the time, they don't do well. Some of the young ones even suicide over it. Being with similar people means that much,.

What this is about is the basic human need of social identity. Theories of social identity say it is learned from the way we are raised. But that's hard to prove when it comes to gay people, because all of them are socialized to be heterosexual when they are growing up. Then they shock everyone when they reveal their true feelings. They didn't learn it--they were born with it. This example provides the grounds for my argument that social identity is as much nature as it is nurture, possibly even more so.

When kids are adopted, most of them as adults want to seek out their original parents. If they are adopted across cultural lines, when they grow up they seek out something of their birth culture. Obama is a classic example of this. He is an American, born to an American woman. But, as far as he's told, his father was Kenyan, so he goes to Kenya, meets distant relatives and stays in touch, and dons their attire to see what it would be like to look like them and wear clothes like them. This is his way of rebuilding a part of himself--his history, his lineage, the vicarious memory he can only build by collecting it from the words and records of the people of his bloodline.

Many people do this as a hobby--they do genealogy.

Most people in the world today, and for us Westerners, our ancestors the same, carried family stories across many generations. In the Middle East, Arabs can name their father's line back many centuries, and tell you stories about each generations. Most indigenous people are able to do the same. So, the sense of who we are not just as individuals, but as part of an ancient collective of peoples is extremely important to human beings. By having a sense of the long history behind us those people who are long gone get to be immortal through us. We have the same desire to be immortal, and because we know we will die, the survival not only of our younger loved ones, but the whole community of people like us is our way of remaining alive forever.

We have that right.

Our remaining alive forever, no matter what race or culture, includes our physical features, as well as other characteristics such as language, mannerisms, brain power, mental characteristics, even the land we live on. Ask any Native American about this. Even though almost all of them are mixed blood, they jealously protect those who are 'pure' blood. And they reject people who come to them as "wannabes" that say they have a great-great grandmother who was Native American and don't feel like those people are "ours".

The same goes for Jews. When Jews marry outside of their race--and yes they do think of themselves as a race, though they hide that when it's convenient--the non-Jewish newcomers usually have a hard time trying to fit in. There is usually at least some kind of "distance" with the other Jewish family members, if not outright conflict. Jews want to protect and preserve their heritage, and even though they promote intermarriage between everyone else, they reject it for themselves. When whites think this way, we are wrongly labeled "racist". But we are just like everyone else in this way--we have the same basic human needs as everyone else. We would like to preserve ourselves and live forever through future generations, too.

But we are the only ones in the world who are punished for this. And many whites among us are brainwashed into punishing each other for thinking and feeling like anyone else on the planet.

I'll turn the discussion towards those white people who call other whites "racists". Usually, it is liberal whites who call conservative whites racist. They say conservatives are racists for all the things they do to protect their families and their families futures. Now, they are calling them "extremists" for trying to preserve what is natural. But there are some interesting observations to be had about the liberals. They, too, engage in acts of cultural isolation, including white flight. For example, there are many people who are involved in alternative spirituality, such as New Age, Witchcraft, American Sufism; and there are many who seek out living among people like themselves in their spirituality. There are many who seek out communities of vegetarians, as well as communities now called "ecotopia" for those who love environmentalism. We see them migrate to places like the northwest coast, or certain areas of Virginia, or Colorado, and so one. When you throw a party or have a gathering of these people, all or almost all of these "open-minded", pro-one-world people are white. It's fascinating to see. I've seen it because I was a liberal. Among circles like these, in my life I only saw two black people. I did see, however, far more Jews.

A few years ago I was invited to a party that was to benefit Obama's run for office. I decided to go. I learned a great deal. Of the more than 25 people there, including the blond, blue-eyed couple who threw the party, only one person was black, and one person was Hispanic. Everyone else was white--even though the couple lived in a county that has a high concentration of Hispanics.

This is actually how liberals live. They shout down and hurl epithets at the people who actually state they want to preserve the nature of their lives as a people, but do more than anyone else to do the actual deed, including avoiding non-whites.

I am one of those people who actually state my support for the preservation of the white race. I want to see pink skin survive. I want to see blue-eyed people live on. I want to stop the loss of red haired people, for they may only have a century left as their numbers fall to nothing. I want to see blonds continue to exist as they are--and for people to stop putting them down just because they are blond. I want to see white people stop being murdered and lynched just because they are white, whether they are from America, South Africa, or anywhere else that hatred against whites is promoted. I want the bashing of white males to end, for that is both racist and sexist--and inhumane as the numbers of male college admissions falls to the lowest rate ever, let alone finishing college. I want the education system to stop punishing boys for being competitive, for that is also inhumane.

I want liberals to stop calling poor whites who are actually very smart "rednecks" for creating something useful out of what the rest of us would call garbage. Stop ridiculing whites who are too poor to afford or drive hours away to Bed Bath and Beyond, while you live around the corner from it. I reject the false rhetoric that Hispanics do the work "white people won't do" as people from places like Appalachia do do the work, and sometimes die for it in places like coal mines. More and more of these same white people fall deeper into poverty as we giver their jobs away to foreigners. White liberals: speak for yourselves. Hispanics do the work you are too good to do. And stop laughing at the poor whites who do, for they are feeding the jobless in their own families.

If anyone is mean and extreme, it is the liberals for punishing other whites for wanting to be themselves, for wanting to preserve their way of life, and for even wanting the unique character of their genes to survive. According to my dictionary, the definition of "liberal" includes "suitable for a freeman; generous bountiful; not narrow in opinion or judgment; tolerant". Of all those people who call themselves "liberal", "progressive", or even "socialist", almost none of them are any of these things in the definition. I almost laughed cynically when I came to the word, "tolerant". They think they are "tolerant" because they like people who are not orthodox, but they clearly hate people who are. And they show it in their actions, words, and intentions.

If there are any truly hateful people, it is most of those who identify as liberal. For as they take a stand for people they call victims, they would like to see the same crimes committed against people they don't like. Even to cause the demise of blue-eyed people.

"White Supremacy" behind concept of "La Raza"

While I'm rarely in agreement with any article I read, this is the first article I've come across that even approaches a question I've had for years, about the struggles "Hispanics" and "Latinos" have with predominantly European American/Western cultures, and yet still adopt a good bit of both into their lives-i.e speak European languages, carry on same genes, same knowledge, infrastructure, etc. I've often wondered about how the preservation of original indigenous peoples is approached south of the border. When I look at articles like this I often root out elements having to do with sovereignty and social identity.

The discussion of voluntary extinction towards the end is a striking concept. I think that is happening quite a few places across mainly the West. Maybe a bit of voluntary extinction of culture across the Islamic world as well, i.e. Indonesia, parts of India, etc.
-RI

http://www.mexica-movement.org/laraza.htm

Viva La Raza?

Jose Vasconcelos
And The White Supremacy
Behind The Concept of "La Raza"
In His Book "La Raza Cosmica"

By Carlos Cordova

July 2009
(last edit December 1, 2009)

During the Chicano Movement of the 1960s and 70s, the term “La Raza” emerged as a means of self-identification for people of Mexican and "Central American" descent. The word was eventually incorporated into mainstream organizations, including La Raza Unida Party (RUP), and The National Council of La Raza. According to several scholarly works on the history of the Chicano Movement, the idea of “La Raza” as a term recognizing a distinct ethnic group originated with Mexican author Jose Vasconcelos and his book, La Raza Cosmica (published 1925) . In his history of La Raza Unida Party, UC Riverside professor Armando Navarro writes, “Chicanos adopted Mexicano philosopher Jose Vasconcelos’s call for a ‘Raza Cosmica,’ with its emphasis on meztizaje (Spanish and indigenous parentage)...”(264). The idea that Vasconcelos' work was the basis for the emergence of the “La Raza” concept also comes from Ignacio Garcia’s work Chicanismo; The Forging of a Militant Ethos, “Indigenismo represented a part of the new heritage that Chicanos were trying to develop…The search for this past also took them to Jose Vasconcelos' ideas on the raza cosmica. This concept of a new race of mixed blood and origin…captivated Chicano activists. To them, Chicanos were the raza cosmica” (71-72).

In published interviews with recognized leaders of the Chicano Movement, it becomes evident that Vasconelos’ concept of La Raza Cosmica had a strong influence on the ideas and philosophy of the movement.

In his book, A Chicano Theology, Andres Guerrero interviewed several intellectuals involved in the movement, among them Jose Angel Gutierrez, Reies Lopez Tijerina, Lupe Anguiano, and Ruben Armendariz. What is particularly revealing about Guerrero’s work is the candid discussions about the importance of Raza as a term for self-identification, and the influence Vasconcelos’ concept had on those who have been identified as major players in the movement. For example, Gutierrerz, who was a co-founder of Raza Unida Party, stated, “It is important for us to use the word raza nowadays because we have to first identify ourselves. In order to be we have to know who we are and in order to know who we are…we tell ourselves who we are, give ourselves our own identity” (127). Guerrero expounds upon Gutierrez’s meaning, by stating that this identity is a mixture of the European and the “indigenous”: “Somos mestizos. Somos la raza” (128). More revealing is the idea expressed by Reies Lopez Tijerina (who promoted Hispano as an identity), who has been described as one of the four major leaders in the Chicano Movement. When asked by Guerrero if the La Raza concept is real to us, he replies, "Of course, I think La Raza is the one that absorbed the other one. When the Spaniards came here, they gave their name to the Indian. The Indian did not absorb the Spaniard. Intermarrying with the Indian only shows that La Raza was flexible and had a mission and was not racist"” (129). Tijerina's comments are particularly disturbing for two reasons, the first being his inability to see that the “absorption” was actually a genocide that killed 95% of the Nican Tlaca population, and secondly, the marriages were in actuality rapes. The fact that Tijerina is considered by many to be one of the main leaders of the Chicano movement and that his views must have had an influence upon others he helped organize, makes one pause.

Unfortunately, Tijerina’s whitewashed and rosy view of the Spanish conquest of Cemanahuac is shared by many of those interviewed by Guerrero. For example, Lupe Anguiano, who was president of the National Woman’s Employment and Education, Inc, at the time stated that this idea of Mesitzaje worked well, and that it, “accomplishes through action what humanists believe in theory. Two different races can marry and make it work…Two cultures can blend to create a new humanity…” (130). Vasconcelos’ writings also influenced Ruben Armendariz, director of the “Latino Studies Program” at McCormick Theological Seminary in Chicago who states, “Vasconcelos was trying to put across that Hispanics represent all the rainbow of colors of people…once you belong to the family of La Raza, color is not an issue.” (129). Armendariz went on later to defend Vasconcelos against charges of white supremacy, by stating that the theme of La Raza Cosmica is not racist itself.

It is this false and ignorant understanding of the term La Raza that this article seeks to address. When one takes the time to read the works of Vasconcelos, it is immediately clear that this man was a white supremacist who viewed the Spanish conquest of Cemanahuc as the best thing to happen in the history of this continent. Even in his book, La Raza Cosmica, his disdain for all things Nican Tlaca is so evident, that one has to wonder if any of the above “leaders” actually took the time to read his work. A quick analysis of Vasconcelos’ ideas will undoubtedly lead anyone with an ounce of Nican Tlaca pride to see that the term Raza should not be used as a self-identifier for people of Mexican or “Central American” descent.

Before discussing the pro-Hispanic/anti-Nican Tlaca basis of “La Raza Cosmica,” let us begin with a broad overview of Vasconcelos’s philosophical outlook, which can be gleaned by examining some of his less popular works. In his book, “Breve historia de Mexico,” Vasconcelos begins by stating matter of factly that the history of Mexico begins with the Spanish discovery of the “New World.” In a tone eerily similar to contemporary white supremacists who seek to justify the European conquest of Anahuac, Vasconcelos writes that, “Before the Spaniards’ arrival Mexico did not exist as a nation; a multitude of tribes...lived in the regions that today form our homeland’s territory” (Marentes, 63). Vasconcelos’ Eurocentric view seeks to classify all Nican Tlaca peoples as small bands of savage wandering tribesmen, and refuses to acknowledge the great urban cities of Anahuac, which included Tenochtitlan (minimum population of 200,000) and Cholula (approximately 100,000), among others. Vasconcelos also praised the Spanish invaders as a “wonderful sort of men,” who brought “genuine democracy” to the people of Anahuac (“Aspects of Mexican Civilization,” 46). In his autobiography, “Ulises Criollo,” Vasconcelos further derides the Nican Tlaca people of Anahuac:

“You cannot find in the peoples of history any that are more limited in the power to change and progress than the aboriginal races of the two Americas…imagine what our peoples would turn into if suddenly they were pried loose from their European colonial matrix” (Crawford, 130).

Vasconcelos’ disgust of Nican Tlaca elements also manifested itself in his views of Emilano Zapata, and the movement he represented. Vasconcelos disdainfully referred to the Zapatistas as nothing more than “a lower-class movement,” whose aim was the “return of Mexico to the primitivism of Montezuma” (Crawford, 105). In Vasconcelos view, the idea that Mexicans could embrace Zapata’s “Indian Movement” was absurd because the “Indian has no civilized standards upon which to fall back” (Aspects, 90). Vasconcelos goes on to write that cities with large European populations in Mexico are “centers of culture” and “islands in a sea of ignorance,” which suffered from periodic invasions that unleashed “forces which have swept away the transplanted values of Europe so laboriously cultivated” (Crawford, 69). Vasconcelos believed that the only way to bring Mexico into modernity was to transform what he saw as the nation’s main problem, its underlying “Aztec way of life."
”
In 1921, Vasconcelos was given an opportunity to try and eradicate this “problem” when he was appointed the first Secretary of Public Education by Mexican president Alvaro Obregon. It was during this time that Vasconcelos organized the Department of Indian Education, which he modeled after the colonial missions of the 16^th century, “the inspiration for the education of the Indians came to us, as was natural, from the Spanish tradition” (Marentes, 130).

This approach is very insightful, because it demonstrates Vasconcelos’ complete disregard for the physical and cultural genocide committed by the Spanish missionaries in the name of Christianity. Vasconcelos saw his new education corps as fundamental to bringing the “Indians out of their ‘primitive’ and ‘idle’ habits” and into “modern” civilization" (Marentes, 57). Of course this meant the replacement of Nican Tlaca languages with the Spanish language and customs, or what noted scholar Guillermo Bonfil Batalla calls de-Indianization: “In Mexico, civilizing has always meant de-Indianizing, imposing the ways of the West” (Batalla, 105). The imposition of Spanish onto the Nican Tlaca communities of Mexico served two purposes for Vasconcelos. The first, and most obvious, was the eventual extinction of Nican Tlaca peoples. The second was more intellectual and revolved around then current ideas of defining nationhood. One must remember that Vasconcelos served as Education minister in the aftermath of the Mexican Revolution, in a period when the country’s leaders were concerned with forging a new national identity. For Vasconcelos and many others in the early 20^th century, a major component of national identity was language. In order to compete against what he saw as more homogenous nations, Mexico itself would need to adopt a more uniform culture, a culture based on Spanish cultural norms.

Another example of Vasconcelos’ disdain for the people of Anahuac can be found in his opposition to the Indigenismo movement in the 1920's and 30's. Lead by people such as Manuel Gamio, Diego Rivera, and others, the idea behind Indigenismo was the celebration and acknowledgement of Nican Tlaca contributions and existence in Mexican culture. For a white supremacist like Vasconcelos, such an idea was nothing short of Hispanic blasphemy. In his autobiography A Criollo Ulysses, Vasconcelos writes:

"I point out there the danger of an Indianism which does not build on the work of Spain, and by means of which the Indian now has an Indian country, that destroys or abuses the work of Spain. Otherwise, having no worthwhile tradiion of his own, the Indian would be left to the mercy of new and strange ideologies." (Crawford, 172).

This view also leads Vasconcelos to clash with, and denounce, the works of such muralists as Rivera and David Alfaro Siqueiros. Early in his job as Education minister, Vasconcelos made available dozens of public buildings on which the muralists could create their works. Thinking that the paintings would celebrate the “Hispanic” tradition of Mexico, what emerged was something quite different. As Siqueiros relates, “the more our work developed, the more it found roots in our tradition…the more detestable it seemed to Vasconcelos” (Marentes, 143).

Vasconelos also sneered upon archeologists who took an interest in investigating the great historical sites of Cemanahuac. Vasconcelos looked upon such scholars with alarm for he felt that the glorification of the Nican Tlaca past was detrimental to the continuation of a Euro-centric nation in Mexico. He particularly frowned upon what he called white Mexicans going to universities in “North America” to study archaeology, for he felt that the courses made “Indians fashionable” with the ultimate goal of burying “the Spanish sediment which the colony bequeathed us.” This abhorrence to all things Nican Tlaca probably originated in Vasconcelos’ realization that the pure white race living in Anahuac was actually quite small, and was eventually destined to disappear in the next several hundred years, a fact that continues to become more evident every decade. Vasconcelos was himself a Criollo, by definition a Spaniard born in Anahuac, whose revisit to his hometown of Oaxaca caused him to pause and contemplate the large number of Nican Tlaca people that lived in the area:

“I noticed how small the white population was, and how many Indians from the surrounding highlands were invading the streets, wrapped in their blankets, silent and impassive. And I understood the whole tragic process of the history of Mexico; it lies in this displacement, in the exhaustion of the conquering and civilizing Spanish blood” (Crawford, 191).

While I do not claim, nor desire, to be an expert on Vasconcelos, it is my opinion that his fears and racism were motivated by this realization. In a debate with archaeologist Manuel Gamio at the University of Chicago in 1926, Vasconcelos stated that the ideas of those who seek to argue for the importation of Europeans to better the country and to “do away with the mestizo and the Indian population” are futile. Not because it is a racist idea, but because it is too late to do so! Vasconcelos laments that there is no other alternative but to accept that “the mestizo is the predominating element in Mexico” (Aspects, 89). So if the so-called mestizo, or the “de-Indianized Indian” as Batalla defines the term, is predominate in numbers, the next best thing is to make sure his cultural and mental allegiance remains colonized to Spain. Herein lies the foundation, in my opinion, of Vasconcelos’ idea of La Raza Cosmica.

To begin, it is interesting to note that the subtitle to Vasconcelos’ La Raza Cosmica is Mission of the Ibero-American Race, with Ibero being a reference to the Iberian Peninsula, or modern day Spain and Portugal. To those unfamiliar with the actual work of Vasconcelos, his idea of La Raza Cosmica is often misunderstood to be a celebration of the coming together, or the mixture of two distinct cultures into a new, more inclusive race. More specifically, it is the mixture of the Nican Tlaca, or Indigenous peoples with the European Spaniards. Unfortunately for many of our people who identify with the La Raza concept, the reality could not be further from the truth. In A Criollo Ulysses, Vasconcelos writes that his idea of a new race was not based on the idea of regressing to the “primitive,” i.e. Nican Tlaca, but on building upon the “solid basis of our Spanish tradition” (215).

One of the major misunderstandings of those who have never taken the time to actually read Vasconcelos’ work, is the idea that Vasconcelos supported Nican Tlaca and Spaniards mixing racially. Quite the contrary. Vasconcelos looked with favor upon the mixing of similar people of the white race, and questioned the results of mixing those with diverse backgrounds. For example, Vasconcelos wrote in La Raza Cosmica that the reason the United States was so powerful was that it was a homogenous country comprised of a people that were a melting pot, yes, but a melting pot of European races. This is what he sees as the key to success. Vasconcelos also looked with favor upon Argentina, where the predominate population is once again a mixture of European races, albeit primarily those from the Mediterranean regions as opposed to the Northern Europeans of the United States (La Raza, 5). As for nations with sizable Nican Tlaca populations like Mexico, Vasconcelos felt that the “mixing” stage was prematurely interrupted by the revolution, and the decision to halt Spanish immigration to the country. As for nations like Peru and Ecuador, politics and poverty prevented wholesale Spanish immigration in large enough numbers to literally fuck the Nican Tlaca peoples into extinction. As a result of this failure to fornicate effectively, the resulting “mixed” population that did exist had “questionable results” (La Raza, 5).

In addition to this white supremacist view of race mixing, Vasconcelos’ work is also full of pseudo-science and outright false history. While Vasconcelos may have been a racist, he was not blind, and to help explain the existence of such sacred sites as Teotihuacan or Chichen Itza, he wrote that the “Indians” of America were descendents of the lost civilization of Atlantis. Obviously for Vasconcelos, the “Indians” of Mexico and Peru were too stupid to have come up with their civilization themselves. As a matter of fact, Vasconcelos writes that in the distant past, the civilization of Atlantis flourished on the American continent, and eventually fell into decline, until it degraded to the point of the “lesser Aztec and Inca empires, totally unworthy of the ancient and superior culture” (La Raza, 9). According to Vasconcelos, after its decline, the ancient Atlanteans left America and flourished in other nations such as Egypt, India, and Greece. Eventually, white Europeans inherited the reigns of civilization from Greece, and again reached the “unforgotten shores” of America, “in order to consummate the task of re-civilization and re-population” (La Raza, 9). So, according to Vasconcelos, the “mission” of the whites is to serve as a “bridge” in the creation of a new race here in America.

But what of this new race that Vasconcelos proposes? Is it truly a “mixture” of the Nican Tlaca and European peoples? For Vasconcelos the answer is obvious, NO! According to Vasconcelos, ALL the Nican Tlaca peoples of Cemanahuac have already been completely incorporated into the European matrix, “Even the pure Indians are Hispanized, they are Latinized, just as the environment itself is Latinized. Say what one may, the red men, the illustrious Atlanteans from whom Indians derive, went to sleep millions of years ago, never to awaken…The Indian has no other door to the future but the door of modern culture, nor any other road but the road already cleared by Latin civilization” (La Raza, 16).

Vasconcelos could not be any clearer. Since the “Indian” has no other option but the “Latin option,” the next stage is to incorporate him/her into the dominant Spanish culture. Eventually, once the Nican Tlaca peoples learn Spanish, put the Spanish agenda ahead of their own, fold and give in and give up their identity, the new Raza Cosmica will emerge. But this new race will not just be a “mixture” of all other races, it will be a new race that has a Spanish foundation and adopts the Catholic religion. For as Vasconcelos saw it, “this implies that our civilization…may be the chosen one to assimilate and to transform mankind into a new type…Spanish colonization created mixed races, this signals its character, fixes its responsibility, and defines its future” (La Raza, 18). So, in other words, the history of rape and atrocities committed by the European invaders against the people of Anahuac is completely justified and predestined by this more important “divine mission” (La Raza, 18).

The final aspect of Vasconcelos’ book I wish to examine returns to my initial claim that his ultimate fear was the realization that the white, European population of Cemanahuac is finite, and will eventually disappear if something is not done to counter it. In his debate with Marnuel de Gamio, Vasconcelos stated, “If we do not wish to be overwhelmed by the wave of the Negro, of the Indian, or of the Asiatic, we shall have to see that [they]…are raised to the higher standards of life, where reproduction becomes regulated and quality predominates over numbers (Aspects, 100-101). In La Raza Cosmica, Vasconcelos makes no effort to conceal his belief that the basis of this new race requires the realization that people must either “marry up,” or disappear completely! Vasconcelos hopes that eventually the old “interbreeding” system, the one where “white colonists took an Indian or black woman because there were no others at hand,” will be replaced by a systematic one in which only the best of all races will breed. For it is the practice of indiscriminate breeding that causes the world to be full of “ugliness, because of our vices”. So once only the “beautiful” people decide to breed, the ugly and useless ones will slowly disappear, “In this way, in a very few generations, monstrosities will disappear…in this manner, for example, the Black could be redeemed, and step by step, by voluntary extinction, the uglier stocks will give way to the more handsome” (La Raza, 32). And what will happen to the Nican Tlaca during this process? According to Vasconcelos, “The Indian” can “graft” himself onto the Spanish race and make “the jump of millions of years that separate Atlantis from our times,” and of course, ultimately “disappear” along with the “Blacks” (La Raza, 32). This idea is further highlighted in his debate with Gamio, where he stated that such a scenario would prevent the “overpowering of the superior few by the uncivilized many” (Aspects, 101).

So having discussed both the personal philosophy and writings of Jose Vasconcelos, does anyone still believe that his concept of La Raza Cosmica is anything other than the ramblings of a white supremacist who fears the inevitable future end of White Europeans on our continent?

In a vain attempt to combat this, Vasconcelos hopes that the large Nican Tlaca populations can be forced to assimilate into the European colonial matrix, and by extension deny its own existence. Unfortunately for members of the Chicano movement in the 1960's, such a diabolical scheme occurred, as many of its leaders began self-identifying themselves as Raza. But if we are honest with ourselves and with others, we will acknowledge that such a term celebrates the idea of Spanish culture, whether it is the language, identity, philosophy or theology, over the Nican Tlaca. This must be stated very clearly, it is not a “mix” but a continued domination of the European colonial matrix.

In an ironic turn, many white supremacist anti-Mexican and anti-Central American“activists” (Neo-Nazis, Minutemen, KKK, etc.) in the last few years have claimed that the idea of La Raza is racist. For once I agree with them! I agree because the concept of "La Raza" seeks to deny us our Nican Tlaca past. So if you choose to identify as "Raza", then you are denying your full Nican Tlaca heritage. Those who understand the white supremacist roots of "Raza" should refrain from using term, along with refusing the concept of "Mestizo" as an identity or Hispanic/Latino as an identity.

VICTIMS HAVE LICENSE TO BECOME PREDATORS UNDER US LAW

Holder Admits No Equality Under Hate Crime Bill

Atty General Eric Holder admits that Bill is not about punishing crimes motivated by hate, but rather about making crimes against 'certain groups' worth-more than comparable crimes against others... and would also give the federal government the right to step into states and re-try if they don't like the way a trial/prosecution turned out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOABBn5Tnm0&feature=player_embedded