"Multicultural Transformation": Code for Jewish Genocide of Europeans

This past week a friend sent me a short video interview of an American Jewess in Sweden seeking to erase Swedish culture by making the Swedes and all of Europe more "multicultural". Today, I found the same video is spectacularly discussed and produced by David Duke in his own video. Barbara Lerner Spectre (any relation to Arlen?) forewarns that "without that transformation", which will most certainly be "led" by the Jewish race, "Europe will not survive".

Just how is it that a people who have existed for 40,000 years will not survive if they do not surrender their social and racial identity as a people? I take Ms. Spectre's words to be a direct threat to the existence of Europeans. Exactly how is it that 800 million people are going to "transform" to conform to this Jewish woman's expectations?

I'll tell you how--I'll tell you what she is not telling you. The Jewish plans to "transform" the European people will happen in no way except through massive violence and force.

Just who exactly gets to decide how Europeans live their lives and express their cultures? This lady seems to thing Jews get to make that call. I believe they call this Chutzpah.

Let me present the following disquisition: I first want to set straight some of the terminologies we have in our political lexicon. There is one thing I hate and that's the misuse of words to mean things they don't. Though the average person doesn't engage this with malicious intent, the originators and many of the messengers of such misused word do.

The first word is "diversity". According to my Webster's (and yes, I look 'em up the old fashioned way--by flipping open a page), "diverse" translates: "differing from one another; UNLIKE; composed of distinct elements or qualities". "Diversity" translates as "the condition of being different; VARIETY; an instance or a point of difference".

The next word is "multiculturalism". Now, would you believe that word has been in existence for such short time it's not even in my 1983 collegiate dictionary? I actually have to look it up online. It's "the doctrine that several different cultures (rather than one national culture) can coexist peacefully and equitably in a single country."

It can? Has anyone been to America lately? Things aren't going so well here, I'm afraid to tell. If you keep your eyes peeled for CNN (Crap, Not News) or Faux News, we're about to explode into all out racial wars over here. But that's the point of it all.

The thinly veiled intentions of multiculturalism isn't a bunch of different cultures peaceably sharing a neighborhood together, but to eventually create a racially and politically monoculture out of all these people--and everyone knows this. "Monoculturalism" is what is meant by "multiculturalism". The erasure of all those differing cultures has a name: Genocide.

In fact, it's historically demonstrated, repeatedly, that "multicultural" states collapse on themselves, most of the time in violence, as with Yugoslavia, Rhodesia, and now South Africa. Sometimes, as with the former Soviet Union, they are maintained via violence. Different groups of people don't want to give themselves up to this--and they shouldn't have to!

We are lead to misbelieve that groups of people whose social identities, religious beliefs, and world views are completely unrelated will take the advice of Rodney King and "all just get along". And Jews believe they are just the people to pull this off. The only way to create this imagined "world" is to destroy individuality.

I have news: It ain't gonna happen. The human spirit is far too powerful to submit to the death of creativity. People will give up their physical lives before living in that world. I'm one of them.

Diversity is not a modern concept to which we all must elevate ourselves. Diversity already exists; in fact it has always been a fact of life for human beings. Even in places where people are thought to be homogeneous diversity is the reality. People differ by gender, regions, age, socio-economic status, profession, political views. Even our perceptions of all those things differ between us.

Of all the world's peoples, there is no group that is as diverse as the people of European ancestry. We are so different among our group that we are the most individualistic people on earth. It is who we are. It is also the reason we have a hard time "sticking together" as the Jews do far beyond even national and linguistic boundaries. Just in Europe there are 50 countries and over 100 languages, many that are endangered. European eye and hair coloring run the full gamut of the human rainbow. These are just among the White people. Red hair and features, according to the National Geographic, stand to fall extinct in less than a century when they had been very common until one or two generations ago.

Go to China and try to find the same level of diversity. Go to Africa and try to find the same level of diversity among the Negros. Even in all of South and Central America, the primary language spoken across nations is Spanish. If American Israelis like Barbara Spectre want to "transform" a continent to one that is multicultural, they have landed on the wrong shores. She needs to go back to the Middle East and start with Israel, one of the most racist nations on the planet. Her own people are carrying out genocide against people who have always been there because they are different from Spectre's people. Once she has success there, I'm sure she would be welcomed to "transform" the Chinese, who are about the most undiverse people I can imagine.

Europe already has diversity. Europe already has extremely heterogenous realities across essentially one race. People of European descent are so different from one another in part because of our deeply individualistic natures. We are very individualistic thinkers.

When you get a room full of a hundred independent thinkers together, you are faced with a hundred different ways of thinking. There is no people on earth more pluralistic than people of European blood. Yet, there seems to be a no more homogeneous group of people than Jews. They stick together even more than Chinese people do. Yet, White people are blamed en mass for the psychopathic crimes of Jews, easily done for they are similar in coloring and features. The intended effect of that projected blame is to weaken the Jews' perceived enemy--us. Jews get away with this because European peoples are so diverse and independent they forget to look out for one another. Those who do look out for other Europeans are shouted down with the vile epithet, "racist". No other people go through this abuse.

There are major problems with diversity. Diverse groups do not trust one another. Under the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, people did not trust one another. They couldn't--in a matter of 50 years from the first of Bolshevik control and all through the gulag years, 60 million were murdered. Intended death sort of has that effect on people. In America, criminality among African Americans is so prevalent (half of all the males have been behind bars) and European Americans have much lower crime statistics. Interracial crimes involving Blacks and Whites are caused almost exclusively perpetrated by Blacks. The lack of trust between Blacks and Whites is profound. Except here, lacking trust is a Black man's entitlement and a White man's "racism". How does that happen? The divisiveness is intended by certain elites with far too much power.

Why the push to "diversify" and already diverse Europe? To destroy actual European diversity. I'll go one farther: To destroy European peoples. What is the intermediate aim by promoting this "diversity"? To impose a homogeneous political space; to submit to the political prison of destroyed social realities. This is ethnic cleansing to say the least. That European peoples value their own individualistic thinking, creativity, and varieties of living is a direct threat to the now overt control Jews have exerted over Europe since at least the lifetime of their hero, Karl Marx.