Stalking the Wild Taboo

Hardin's Law - It takes five years for a willing person's mind to change. Have patience with yourself and others when treading in an area protected by a taboo.

http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/index.html

German grandchildren of Nazis delve into past

As a person of Irish descent, and descendant of genocide, slavery, and exile, I look upon the constant bilking of the suffering identity as a cash cow. The fact is every single human being on the planet is a victim. The task is in what we choose to do with it. People can rise above their victimhood and choose not to victimize more people. The problem is, a lot of victims feel that the things that happened to them gives them the right to harm other people, and control them with their wounds. Many victims become predators. All predators were once victims, and they are the ones to blame for repeating the past.

"Never again" has become never forget, never let them forget, and exact revenge.

The Jews are committing genocide against the Palestinians, scream "Holocaust" the whole way, and the Palestinians never had anything to do with that, and rightly defend their lives. Jews control the entire European race by inflicting collective guilt so that they have our support in the evil things they do, like steal land, wipe Palestinians and other Middle Easterners off the map, and enslave the middle class of the Western world with their banking and Wall Street usury. They get away with brainwash because they control Hollywood and all forms of media, press, and publishing.

I for one am sick of watching my people be their slaves and Palestinians get erased from the earth. As a descendant of genocide, I'm sick of the holocaust cash cow.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/eu_germany_crimes_of_the_fathers

Congressional Candidate Dan Adler and His Racist Ad

Congressional Candidate Dan Adler and His Racist Ad

by Ralph Iver

The title of recent news articles say Jewish congressional candidate, Dan Adler "targets Asians with bizarre ad". That title should instead read "Dan Adler Targets Asians with Racist Ad".

It appears that he is stereotyping Asians and faces flack for his condescending approach to them. Perhaps the thought should occur to people that much racial impropriety by people who appear "White" are actually done by people who are Jews.

Adler states in his ad that "I definitely approve this message." What does he approve? With this video ad, expressing that he is Jewish, he approves that minorities "should stick together"--and the unspoken is against, who else, but majority Whites; implying that White people should be excluded; that he will represent minorities over Whites; that minorities should encourage thoughts and acts of racism toward Whites, at a minimum denying them adequate representation. Dan Adler's campaign presents a clear message of his intentions to disenfranchise a majority group of people based on their race: people of European descent.

In the past week, mainstream media has released that in ten states, White children under age 18 are now the minority. How does Adler's ad, a thinly veiled statement of prejudice towards Whites, fit in with that reality? Adler is a supporter of immigration reform and the DREAM act, which will hasten the demise of Westernization, Western values, and yes, White people as a race. His intent clearly is to make a shrinking race of Whites utter strangers in their own land. Indeed, for many of us, we already are.

Adding to the seriousness of all this is the fact that Whites are disallowed any claims to being victimized on account of their race--ever. It is extremely difficult to win an argument that Whites are often victims on account of their race, let alone stop actual disenfranchisement, loss of equity, and violence.

Adler uses his Jewishness (not his White skin color) to ally himself racially with local constituents, Asian people. However, do Asians understand that the creator of the atom bomb that decimated Hiroshima and Nagasaki was Jewish? J. Robert Oppenheimer, a communist, stated of his part in this genocide of Asians, "I carry no weight on my conscience." Alder seems to carry no weight on his conscience in using Asians and other "minorities" to promote his racist agenda to exclude White people from representation by their government officials. He carries no weight on his shoulder for his part for the coming loss of the United States as a Western nation. He carries no weight on his shoulders for promoting minorities to "stick together" as a group, deepening the wedges in the American identity and hastening balkanization.

But we are not looking solely at a racial issue. We have here an equally deep problem in the loss of Westernization. People have differing worldviews along racial and regional lines. In the grand scheme are the two major world views, the Occident and the Orient. The Occident, Westernization, is shrinking fast due to the flood of non-European immigration into European homelands. What will not be annihilated by the homicide of anti-White policies and laws will be completed with the suicide of socially-promoted "White Guilt". In their own countries, Koreans are the majority, Chinese are the majority, and Japanese are the majority--and proudly so; however, the United States, which had a 90% majority of Whites in 1960, has fallen so far since the 1965 immigration act that we will have no majority race in another 30 years. This is unimaginable in places like China and Korea. Floods of non-Asian immigration do not happen in Asian countries, yet, it is aggressively promoted in Western nations, even by law. Asians have protected their racial integrity and guarded their right to their non-Western world views. We are rapidly losing ours.

Pat Buchanan wrote in the introduction to his book, Death of the West,

"[N]o nation in history has gone through a demographic change of this magnitude in so short a time, and remained the same nation. Mr. Clinton assured us that it will be a better America when we are all minorities and realize true 'diversity'. Well, those students are going to find out, for they will spend their golden years in a Third World America. Uncontrolled immigration threatens to deconstruct the nation we grew up in and convert America into a conglomeration of peoples with almost nothing in common--not history, heroes, language, culture, faith, or ancestors. Balkanization beckons."

Who is Dan Adler, anyway? He is a member of the American Jewish Committee's National Board of Governors. He is also on a board of directors at the Israeli Policy Forum, a diplomatic organization that supports a two-state solution between the Israelis and Palestinians, and has been accused of being pro-Palestinian. Adler concurs with the two-state solution that might be in the interests of Palestinians. However, he takes the expected hard-line that "America's responsibility to Israel is an unshakable one". One of one side of his mouth he supports negotiations; on the other side negotiation is not possible, and America's loyalty must be "unshakable". He also stands against Iran--one more war positioned to wipe thousands more innocents off the map.

From the news, we find he is a former executive of Disney. Why is this important? Walt Disney cleaned up fairytales for children and promoted wholesome values for families, at a time when the nation was a majority of devout Christians. At the time of his production company, as a Christian he was a minority in a very Jewish Hollywood. Disney, a hardened anti-communist, was inconclusively rumored to be an anti-Semite (in other words, there is not enough evidence to this, and we will never know for sure). After his death, Disney productions was overtaken by the very people he purported held in contempt, and who have lead the company steadily away from Disney's values of old fashion commitment to family and decency.

The following is an excerpt about the transfer of power to Jewish bosses after Walt Disney's death, by William Pierce:

The real problem, of course, was that Walt Disney's vision of the world, as reflected in the films he produced, was wholly different from that of the Jewish film producers around him. As long as Walt was making Mickey Mouse or Donald Duck cartoons, this problem could be overlooked. When he began animating feature-length fairy tales like Snow White and Cinderella, the Jews in Hollywood became increasingly nervous. The world of Snow White was an entirely White world, a European world. It stirred racial memories in White Americans, and the aim of the Jewish media bosses then as now was to make White Americans forget their roots. They wanted to begin promoting multiculturalism as soon as the Second World War was over, and Walt was in their way. They couldn't push racial mixing in their films and have someone as popular as Walt Disney refuse to go along: the contrast would be obvious to the public. Even Disney's extremely popular Nature films were resented by the rest of Hollywood. Films which promoted a love for animals and the natural world were viewed with suspicion by men whose view of life was entirely economic and urban.

These may seem like subtle differences, and in fact most people outside of Hollywood were oblivious to the ideological and cultural conflict between Walt Disney and the other film producers. The closest that the conflict came to attracting public attention was during the 1940s and early 1950s, when Walt Disney's total lack of sympathy for Communism and his refusal to let Communist propaganda be introduced into any of his productions set him apart from the rest of Hollywood. While Walt was alive, however, there wasn't much that Hollywood could do about him. He was too popular with the American people.

After Walt died in 1966, however, the situation changed. His company had depended on his genius for its prosperity, and without him it had a difficult time keeping up with the competition. After Disney company profits had declined for several years, Jewish corporate raiders Saul Steinberg and Irwin Jacobs moved in for the kill. In 1984, after Steinberg had milked the company of $32 million, Disney family shareholders were too weak to resist a takeover by Michael Eisner, the Jewish boss of Paramount Pictures. Eisner in turn brought in as his second in command another Jew, Jeffrey Katzenberg. The company that Walt Disney built -- the company that gave us Snow White and Fantasia -- has been in Jewish hands ever since.

During his first day as chairman of the Disney company -- his first day, believe it or not -- Eisner ordered the production of an R-rated film, about the kinky sexual misadventures of a typically neurotic Jewish family in the Los Angeles area. This was the first R-rated film ever produced by the Disney company -- but certainly not the last.

Speaking of R-rated, Adler, backed by his former Disney colleague, Michael Eisner, produced two more video ads making use of R-rated language, having his 11-year old son use foul language for the cameras. Disney would have rolled over in his grave over how his vision, which was also America's vision in a more unified time, has been profoundly undermined.

Mocking Jesus on Israeli TV

This needs to reach every Christian in America. I'm angry at this never ending sickness of these people, and I'm even angrier at the support they get from the people they degrade. But you won't see Christians rioting in the streets with violence over this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JA6vRC1xW_c&feature=player_embedded

Ahmadinejad DID NOT threaten to "wipe Israel off the map."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mScWWtRfGQ&NR=1&feature=fvwp

From 2007.

What is Patriotism?

Patriotism is rooted in social identity as a basic human need and a basic human right. Patriotism is a feeling of love, honor, and dedication for being part of a people. It is saying "I am part of something much larger than myself." It is a deep valuing of one's own social identity with a group of people who are like ourselves, and with whom we share a long and significant history. We share stories of our people from long before our birth, and have a love for those of our people long dead who have helped to pave the way to who we are today, as we pave the way for our future generations whom we will never know. Patriotism is never about loving a government, for history shows over and over that people have few rights under centralized rulership, and often find themselves its slaves, serfs, or indentured servants. Patriotism is loving the character of who we are: how we are a people, our genetic lines, our stories passed down through the centuries, our triumphs and tragedies, the lands upon which we live, the inner and outer rings of our culture, and what we believe about ourselves. The rings of our culture begins with our family groups, to our extended families, to our local communities, to our regions (such as Appalachia) to our more modern nation, to Westernization/Occident culture. Obviously many groups exist under the larger umbrellas. Patriotism is not the source of violence. Sabotage to patriotism is. Love of one's own people is not the source of violence--threat to one's own people is. As well as greed by the outer group. For example, when another group invades our land for the purpose of usurping what we have (translation: threaten us and our survival--and unity of our group is about our survival) violence begins to emerge anywhere in the range from rejecting people all the way out to mass violence. Sabotage to a group identity also breaks down the group to where they are more easily victimized, taken over, and even genocided by a unified outer group. A divided people is easiest to conquer, kill, and enslave. When our stories (our history) is denied to our consciousness, we lose "who we are". How many people do we know who do genealogy as a hobby, and from the side lines the rest of us love learning about our great, great, great, great grandparents, and so on? How many of us love to learn we have ancient ancestors from the time of Arthur, or that we have indigenous dark Irish bloodline, or that we have ancestors from a specific ancient African tribe? We love that stuff, but we are losing it. By losing the stories of our history we lose the sense that we are a part of something much greater than ourselves. Those who lose that are overtaken by people who have a unified sense of themselves, and it is the strong and unified who survive. For example, the Chinese and the Indians have a very strong sense of who they are and their survival will surpass Americans by thousands of years. Someday we Americans will be long gone because we don't have what they have--the patriotism, the love of our own people that it takes to survive.

"Blood LIbel": The Scapegoating of Sarah Palin

The attached video shows four minutes of clips from Twitter users calling for the death and murder of Sarah Palin. This evidence was already removed once, but reposted. Should it be removed again, search for "Twitter Users Death Wish on Sarah Palin".

It was a Jewish Marxist terrorist who murdered a nine year old child this past Saturday. Jared Lee Loughner felled the blood of 20 people, slaying six of them. He even shot two of his own people, one of whom is Jewish Congressional Representative, Gabrielle Giffords.

Meanwhile, thousands of liberals call for the murder and shooting death of Sarah Palin. I suppose this means that Palin will require security protection on account of their "incendiary rhetoric".

In her defense against the thousands of calls for her murder by liberals, Sarah Palin's use of "blood libel" was right on the money. This time, the charge is actually true. "Blood libel" refers to a time when it is said Christians falsely accused Jews of murdering missing children, or children whose deaths could not be explained, for the use of their blood. While it is highly doubtful that Palin used the term to mean anything other than "falsely accused" , as it is now widely understood, she could not have used a more truthful term. A Jew, named Jared Loughner, really did kill a child and five other people.

Jewish supremacists across the nation pounced on Palin for using this term in defense of her own life. Abraham Foxman of the ADL, Simon Greer of the Jewish Funds for Justice, heads of pro-Israeli lobbies such as Jeremy Ben-Ami, the president of J Street, David A. Harris President of the National Jewish Democratic Council, and many more state the Palin's use of the word is inflammatory and even associated her with anti-Semitism. How, then, do all these people explain the false accusations from the entire left that Palin is responsible for the murders in Arizona? How do they explain that one of their own leftist people actually did kill a child, five adults, and wounded 14 others? They "doth protest too much, me thinks".

When a Jew commits a terrible crime, no responsibility is taken by the tribe, but to present the criminal to the world as a "white man".

When a Marxist commits a terrible crime, no responsibility is taken by the liberals, but to present the criminal to the world as a "tea bagger".

As they chose to divide from conservatives by blaming them, open-minded, peace-loving, anti-hate, anti-violence, anti-death penalty, anti-war liberals gleefully called for the murder and shooting death of Sarah Palin. They blame her for an act of terrorism that one of their own people committed. The word hypocrisy doesn't even touch the evil of their thoughts and words. However, "blood libel" certainly comes about as close to the truth as it could get.

The scapegoating of Palin, as well as the Tea Party and conservative citizens as a whole reaches a level of malevolence almost to that of the terrorist act itself. It is a shame that these people are also Americans.